An item response theory analysis of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder criteria in a population-based sample of 11- to 12-year-old children.
An item response theory analysis of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder criteria in a population-based sample of 11- to 12-year-old children.
复制标题
对 11 至 12 岁儿童人群样本中 DSM-IV 边缘型人格障碍标准进行项目反应理论分析。
DOI：
10.1037/a0027948
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Zanarini,MaryC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Michonski,JaredD;Sharp,Carla;Steinberg,Lynne;Zanarini,MaryC
虽然越来越多的实证文献为青年边缘型人格障碍（BPD）的诊断提供了一些支持，但对BPD的内部结构和个体诊断标准的表现知之甚少，特别是在年轻样本中。我们使用项目反应理论（IRT）的方法来调查心理测量学的精神疾病诊断和统计手册，第4版（DSM-IV）BPD标准在一个大的，以人口为基础的样本（n= 6,339）的年轻青少年从英国（11至12岁）。使用DSM-IV边缘型人格障碍的儿童期访谈评估BPD（CI-BPD; Zanarini，Horwood，Waylen，& Wolke，2004）。一个单一的基本维度足以解释BPD标准之间的协变。每一个标准被发现是歧视的程度与成人研究中所报告的。BPD标准在+1和+3标准单位之间的BPD病理严重程度范围内提供的信息最多。五个标准被发现表现出差异项目功能（DIF）的男孩和女孩之间。然而，DIF在面试总分中占了上风。尽管将边缘结构应用于青少年存在争议，但目前的研究结果提供了支持这样做的心理测量证据。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2019阿帕，保留所有权利）
Although a growing body of empirical literature provides some support for the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in youth, little is known about the internal structure of BPD and the performance of the individual diagnostic criteria, especially in younger samples. We used item response theory (IRT) methods to investigate the psychometric properties of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM–IV) BPD criteria in a large, population-based sample (n= 6,339) of young adolescents from the United Kingdom (ages 11 to 12). BPD was assessed using the Childhood Interview for DSM–IV Borderline Personality Disorder (CI-BPD; Zanarini, Horwood, Waylen, & Wolke, 2004). A single underlying dimension adequately accounted for covariation among the BPD criteria. Each criterion was found to be discriminating to a degree comparable to what has been reported in adult studies. BPD criteria were most informative within a range of severity of BPD pathology between+ 1 and+ 3 standard units. Five criteria were found to exhibit differential item functioning (DIF) between boys and girls. However, DIF balanced out for the total interview score. Despite the controversy associated with applying the borderline construct to youth, the current findings provide psychometric evidence in favor of doing so.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)