Within-language lexical interference can be resolved in a similar way to between-language interference.
Within-language lexical interference can be resolved in a similar way to between-language interference.
复制标题
语内词汇干扰的解决方式与语间干扰相似。
DOI：
10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104760
复制
发表时间：
2021-09
期刊：
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Hernandez DC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ivanova I;Hernandez DC
本研究探讨单语者是否能以类似于双语者解决跨语言干扰的机制来解决一种语言中的词汇干扰。这些机制被称为双语语言控制，被认为至少部分是自上而下的，并且通常与线索语言混合一起研究，我们在这里使用的版本。平衡（实验1）和非平衡的西班牙语-英语双语（实验2）命名的图片在他们的语言。来自两个不同美国城市的英语单语者（实验3和4）仅用英语命名图片，鞋）或从属名称（例如，运动鞋）。所有的实验都是相同的结构，并开始与块命名在每种语言或名称类型，其次是两种语言或名称类型之间的试验级切换，其次是块命名。我们分析了转换，混合和（这里介绍）后混合成本，优势效应和重复效益。在双语实验中，我们发现了一些显性去优先化的迹象，这是双语语言控制的行为标志：显性语言名称的成本高于非显性语言名称。重要的是，在单语实验中，我们还发现了显性去优先化的迹象：基本级别的成本高于从属名称。出乎意料的是，只有在单语实验中，我们也发现了一个完全的优势逆转：基本级别的名字（否则表现为主导）比从属名字的整体产生得更慢。总之，这些结果是很难解释自下而上的机制通常假设单语干扰决议。因此，我们得出结论，自上而下的机制可能（有时）参与词汇干扰的解决不仅在语言之间，而且在一种语言。
This study asks if monolinguals can resolve lexical interference within a language with mechanisms similar to those used by bilinguals to resolve interference across languages. These mechanisms are known as bilingual language control, are assumed to be at least in part top-down, and are typically studied with cued language mixing, a version of which we use here. Balanced (Experiment 1) and nonbalanced Spanish-English bilinguals (Experiment 2) named pictures in each of their languages. English monolinguals from two different American cities (Experiments 3 and 4) named pictures in English only with either basic-level (e.g., shoe) or subordinate names (e.g., sneaker). All experiments were identically structured and began with blocked naming in each language or name type, followed by trial-level switching between the two languages or name types, followed again by blocked naming. We analysed switching, mixing and (introduced here) post-mixing costs, dominance effects and repetition benefits. In the bilingual experiments, we found some signs of dominant deprioritization, the behavioral hallmark of bilingual language control: larger costs for dominant- than for nondominant-language names. Crucially, in the monolingual experiments, we also found signs of dominant deprioritization: larger costs for basic-level than for subordinate names. Unexpectedly and only in the monolingual experiments, we also found a complete dominance reversal: Basic-level names (which otherwise behaved as dominant) were produced more slowly overall than subordinate names. Taken together, these results are hard to explain with the bottom-up mechanisms typically assumed for monolingual interference resolution. We thus conclude that top-down mechanisms might (sometimes) be involved in lexical interference resolution not only between languages but also within a language.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Branzi, Francesca M.;Martin, Clara D.;Costa, Albert
通讯作者：
Costa, Albert
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Abutalebi, Jubin;Annoni, Jean-Marie;Khateb, Asaid
通讯作者：
Khateb, Asaid
DOI：
10.1080/016909699386275
发表时间：
1999-08-01
期刊：
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES
影响因子：
--
作者：
Costa, A;Sebastián-Gallés, N;Caramazza, A
通讯作者：
Caramazza, A
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Bialystok, Ellen;Craik, Fergus I. M.;Freedman, Morris
通讯作者：
Freedman, Morris
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Bialystok, E;Martin, MM
通讯作者：
Martin, MM