Relative to a Random Oracle A, PA != NPA != co-NPA with Probability 1

Relative to a Random Oracle A, PA != NPA != co-NPA with Probability 1
复制标题

相对于随机预言 A,PA != NPA != co-NPA,概率为 1

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1981
期刊:
SIAM journal on computing (Print)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
John Gill
John Gill
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Charles H. Bennett;John Gill

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

让A是通过为每个字符串x扔一个公平的硬币来随机选择的语言,以确定x是否属于A。 }^a $,$ {\ bf np}^a $,$ {\ bf pp}^a $,$ {\ textbf {pspace}}^a $在下一个中正确包含。另外,$ {\ bf np}^a \ ne {\ text {co-}} {\ bf np}^a $具有概率1。使用类$ {\ bf bpp}^a $ a $的概率甲骨文机器识别的语言,错误概率均匀地限制在$ \ tfrac {1} {2} $下方。 $ {\ bf np}^a $显示为1,概率1,包含$ {\ bf p}^a $ -immune Set,即,在$ {\ bf p}^a $中没有无限子集的集合。简要讨论了$ {\ bf p}^a $ - immunity与p-sparseness和$ {\ bf np}^a $ completeness:$ {\ bf p}^a $ -immune sets in $ {\ {\ bf np}^a $可能是稀疏或中等密度的,但不能是共同的。相对于随机长度放置置换$ \ pi $,而不是rand ...
Let A be a language chosen randomly by tossing a fair coin for each string x to determine whether x belongs to A. With probability 1, each of the relativized classes ${\textbf{LOGSPACE}}^A $, ${\bf P}^A $, ${\bf NP}^A $, ${\bf PP}^A $, and ${\textbf{PSPACE}}^A $ is properly contained in the next. Also, ${\bf NP}^A \ne {\text{co-}} {\bf NP}^A $ with probability 1. By contrast, with probability 1 the class ${\bf P}^A $ coincides with the class ${\bf BPP}^A $ of languages recognized by probabilistic oracle machines with error probability uniformly bounded below $\tfrac{1}{2}$. ${\bf NP}^A $ is shown, with probability 1, to contain a ${\bf P}^A $-immune set, i.e., a set having no infinite subset in ${\bf P}^A $. The relationship of ${\bf P}^A $-immunity to p-sparseness and ${\bf NP}^A $-completeness is briefly discussed: ${\bf P}^A $-immune sets in ${\bf NP}^A $ can be sparse or moderately dense, but not co-sparse. Relativization with respect to a random length-preserving permutation $\pi $, instead of a rand...