FOOD SHORTAGE INFLUENCES SIBLING AGGRESSION IN THE BLUE-FOOTED BOOBY
FOOD SHORTAGE INFLUENCES SIBLING AGGRESSION IN THE BLUE-FOOTED BOOBY
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/0003-3472(89)90065-1
复制
发表时间:
1989-05-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
CHAVELAS, CG
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
DRUMMOND, H;CHAVELAS, CG
In the blue-footed booby, Sula nebouxii, the first-hatched chick sometimes eliminates its brood-mate in the first few weeks, when food is short. To test the hypothesis (based on descriptive data) that sibling aggression increases with food deprivation and intensifies when the senior chick''s weight is 20-25% below potential, both chicks'' necks were taped to inhibit ingestion and behaviour was compared with controls. Under deprivation, pecking increased, rising steeply when seniors were at roughly the proposed weight threshold; begging increased, with seniors possibly suppressing begging of juniors; and in young broods (less than 6 weeks old) the senior chick''s feeding advantage increased from 37 to 57% more attempted parental feeds than its sibling during deprivation. Pecking rates were more than three times higher in young broods than in old broods, where differential feeding was absent, and the effect of food deprivation on pecking increased with age in the first 6 weeks and subsequently declined with age. These age-related changes may be partly due to developmental improvement in walking ability, enabling older juniors to evade aggression. When deprivation ended, pecking, begging and feeding tended to return to baseline values, implying a reversible mechanism. The aggressive tendency of the senior chick appears to be influenced by the amount of food delivered to the brood, an effect possibly mediated by the chick''s nutritional condition or hunger.