Making Attributions to the Physician following Closing Arguments of a Simulated Medical Malpractice Suit: Jurors' Sex, Health Locus of Control, and Locus of Authority
Making Attributions to the Physician following Closing Arguments of a Simulated Medical Malpractice Suit: Jurors' Sex, Health Locus of Control, and Locus of Authority
复制标题
在模拟医疗事故诉讼的结案陈词后对医生进行归因：陪审员的性别、健康控制点和权威点
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1997
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
D. Worthington
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Worthington
这项研究在由受试者陪审员进行的模拟试验中检查了陪审员的健康控制点、权威点、性别和分配给医生的归因。受试者观看了虚构的医疗事故案件的结案陈词录像，并将过失归咎于案件中的每一方。主要发现是，女性（57.00%）倾向于比男性（37.92%）向医生分配更大的责任。
This study examined jurors' health locus of control, locus of authority, sex, and attribution assigned to the physician in a simulated trial by subject-jurors. Subjects viewed videotaped closing arguments of a fictionalized medical malpractice case and assigned fault to each party in the case. The primary finding was that women tended to assign greater responsibility (57.00%) to the physician than did men (37.92%).