Artificial Intelligence and the 'Good Society': the US, EU, and UK approach
Artificial Intelligence and the 'Good Society': the US, EU, and UK approach
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
复制
发表时间：
2018-04-01
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Floridi, Luciano
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cath, Corinne;Wachter, Sandra;Floridi, Luciano
2016年10月，白宫、欧洲议会和英国下议院各自发布了一份报告，概述了他们对如何让社会为人工智能（AI）的广泛使用做好准备的愿景。在本文中，我们对这三份报告进行了比较评估，以促进有利于发展“良好人工智能社会”的政策设计。为此，我们研究了每份报告如何解决以下三个主题：（a）发展一个“良好的人工智能社会”;（B）政府，私营部门和研究界（包括学术界）在追求这种发展中的作用和责任;以及（c）支持这种发展的建议可能需要改进。我们的分析得出的结论是，这些报告充分解决了各种道德，社会和经济问题，但未能为“良好的人工智能社会”的发展提供总体政治愿景和长期战略。为了有助于填补这一空白，我们在结论中建议采取双管齐下的办法。
In October 2016, the White House, the European Parliament, and the UK House of Commons each issued a report outlining their visions on how to prepare society for the widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI). In this article, we provide a comparative assessment of these three reports in order to facilitate the design of policies favourable to the development of a 'good AI society'. To do so, we examine how each report addresses the following three topics: (a) the development of a 'good AI society'; (b) the role and responsibility of the government, the private sector, and the research community (including academia) in pursuing such a development; and (c) where the recommendations to support such a development may be in need of improvement. Our analysis concludes that the reports address adequately various ethical, social, and economic topics, but come short of providing an overarching political vision and long-term strategy for the development of a 'good AI society'. In order to contribute to fill this gap, in the conclusion we suggest a two-pronged approach.