Alternatives to routine ultrasound for eligibility assessment prior to early termination of pregnancy with mifepristone-misoprostol
Alternatives to routine ultrasound for eligibility assessment prior to early termination of pregnancy with mifepristone-misoprostol
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02753.x
复制
发表时间:
2011-01-01
影响因子:
5.8
通讯作者:
Winikoff, B.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bracken, H.;Clark, W.;Winikoff, B.
ObjectiveTo test the feasibility and efficacy of an approach that foregoes the routine use of ultrasound for the determination of eligibility for medical termination of pregnancy.DesignProspective trial.SettingTen termination of pregnancy clinics in the USA.PopulationA total of 4484 women seeking termination of pregnancy with mifepristone-misoprostol.MethodsWomen provided estimates of the date of their last menstrual period and underwent pelvic bimanual and ultrasound examinations. We compared estimates of gestational age using these three methods.Main outcome measureProportion of women of < 9 weeks' gestation by woman or provider estimate, but > 9 weeks' gestation by ultrasound.ResultsThe reliance on women's report of their last menstrual period together with physical examination to determine their eligibility for termination of pregnancy with mifepristone-misoprostol would result in few women (63/4008 or 1.6%) accepted for treatment outside the current limits of standard mifepristone-misoprostol regimens used for early termination of pregnancy (i.e. < 63 days' gestation on ultrasound).ConclusionsLast menstrual period and physical examination alone, without the routine use of ultrasound, are highly effective for the determination of women's eligibility for early termination of pregnancy with mifepristone-misoprostol.