Transcending Analytical Cliquishness with Second-generation Governance Network Analysis
Transcending Analytical Cliquishness with Second-generation Governance Network Analysis
复制标题
通过第二代治理网络分析超越分析派系
DOI：
10.1057/9780230596283_14
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Olsen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Martin Marcussen;H. Olsen
在分析治理网络方面，似乎形成了两种截然不同的传统，但没有充分利用彼此的方法和分析优势。第一种是社会网络分析，主要由美国社会科学家运用定量研究方法进行实践。它强调行为者的网络属性和/或他们在更大网络中的结构地位。第二个传统，政策网络研究，主要是一种欧洲现象，强调行为者为网络带来的经济和政治资源、网络行为者之间的相互依赖以及网络谈判所嵌入的更大的体制背景。
Two distinct traditions in the analysis of governance networks appear to have developed without drawing significantly on one another’s methodological and analytical strengths. The first, Social Network Analysis, is primarily practiced by American social scientists applying quantitative research methods. It emphasizes the network attributes of actors and/or their structural position in larger networks. The second tradition, Policy Network Studies, is primarily a European phenomenon emphasizing the economic and political resources that actors bring with them to networks, interdependence between network actors, as well as the larger institutional context in which network negotiation is embedded.