Beyond Reform: Restructuring for More Effective Conflict Intervention
Beyond Reform: Restructuring for More Effective Conflict Intervention
复制标题
超越改革:重组以更有效地干预冲突
DOI:
10.1163/19426720-00302002
复制
发表时间:
1997
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
George T. Raach
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Chayes;A. Chayes;George T. Raach
You cannot enforce peace when your own structure is an undisciplined and often chaotic set of rival bureaucratic fiefdoms.-Chester Crocker1 he international community has quickly accumulated wide experience in its efforts to prevent and manage internal conflicts and their aftermath. In response to the unexpected proliferation of such cases since the end of the Cold War, the UN has launched at least eighteen major operations since 1990-more than in the previous forty-five years. Interventions have been made on every continent, and. in addition to UN agencies, individual states, ad hoc coalitions, other international governmental organizations (IGOs-both global and regional), as well as nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have responded. The mere listing of organizations operating in Croatia and Sarajevo in 1996 is two inches thick and ranges from the UN tc" Clowns without Frontiers." These actors have performed all the tasks set forth in former secretary-general Boutros Boutros-Ghali's 1992 Agenda for Peace, including conflict prevention by diplomacy and troop deployment, classical peacekeeping, socalled peace enforcement, the provision of humanitarian assistance at all stages of conflict, and physical and institutional reconstruction of war-tom societies. These operations in the aggregate have disposed of extensive resources-approximately $4 billion annually. 2 Yet the results of international efforts have been disappointing. In some cases, such as in the Great Lakes region of Africa and in some circumstances in the former Soviet Union, it has been nearly impossible to rouse international commitment equal to the magnitude of the problem. In Bosnia, even like-minded allies have often failed to reach consensus. Although they may agree that" something must be done," they are not always able to concur about what that" something" is. This can lead to paralysis or palliative measures.