Co-seismic signatures in magnetometer, geophone, and infrasound data during the Meinong Earthquake
Co-seismic signatures in magnetometer, geophone, and infrasound data during the Meinong Earthquake
复制标题
美浓地震期间磁力计、地震检波器和次声数据的同震特征
DOI:
10.3319/tao.2017.03.05.01
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Liu Zhengyan
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liu Jann Yenq;Chen Chieh Hung;Wu Tsung Yu;Chen Hsiao Ching;Hattori Katsumi;Yang I Ching;Bleier Tom;Kappler Karl;Xia Yaqin;Chen Weisheng;Liu Zhengyan
This paper utilizes 10 stations of co-located seismometer, QuakeFinder/infrasound to observe co-seismic signatures triggered by the 6 February 2016 M 6.6 Meinong Earthquake. Each QuakeFinder system consists of a 3-axes induction magnetometer, an air conductivity sensor, a geophone, and temperature/relative humidity sensors. There are no obvious charges in the positive/negative ions, the temperature, and the humidity, while the magnetometer, the geophone, and infrasound data detect clear co-seismic signatures, similar to seismic waves recorded by seismometers. The magnetometers register high-frequency pulsations, like seismic waves, and superimpose with low-frequency variations, which could be caused by the magnetometer shaking/tilting and/or the underground water level change, respectively, upon the arrival of seismic waves. The spectrum centering around 2.0 Hz of the co-seismic geophone fluctuations is similar to that of the seismic waves. However, the energy of co-seismic geophone fluctuations (also magnetometer pulsations) yields an exponential decay to the distance of a station to the epicenter, while the energy of the seismic waves is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. This suggests that the mechanisms for detecting seismic waves of the QuakeFinder system and seismometers are different. In general, the geophone and magnetometer/infrasound system are useful to record highand low-frequency seismic waves, respectively. Article history: Received 15 November 2016 Revised 2 March 2017 Accepted 5 March 2017
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
D. Widarto;T. Mogi;Yoshikazu Tanaka;T. Nagao;K. Hattori;S. Uyeda
通讯作者:
D. Widarto;T. Mogi;Yoshikazu Tanaka;T. Nagao;K. Hattori;S. Uyeda
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
H. Ren;Qinghua Huang;Xiaofei Chen
通讯作者:
H. Ren;Qinghua Huang;Xiaofei Chen
影响因子:
--
作者:
Jann‐Yenq Liu;Y. Tsai;Chieh‐Hung Chen;Yuh-Ing Chen;H. Yen
通讯作者:
Jann‐Yenq Liu;Y. Tsai;Chieh‐Hung Chen;Yuh-Ing Chen;H. Yen
影响因子:
4
作者:
Jann‐Yenq Liu;L. Chang;C. Chao;Ming-Quey Chen;Y. Chu;L. Hau;Chienwen Huang;C. Kuo;Lou‐Chuang Lee;L. Lyu;Chia-Hsien Lin;C. Pan;J. Shue;C. Su;L. Tsai;Ya-Hui Yang;Chien‐Hung Lin;R. Hsu;H. Su
通讯作者:
Jann‐Yenq Liu;L. Chang;C. Chao;Ming-Quey Chen;Y. Chu;L. Hau;Chienwen Huang;C. Kuo;Lou‐Chuang Lee;L. Lyu;Chia-Hsien Lin;C. Pan;J. Shue;C. Su;L. Tsai;Ya-Hui Yang;Chien‐Hung Lin;R. Hsu;H. Su
DOI:
10.1186/bf03352449
发表时间:
2002-12
期刊:
Earth, Planets and Space
影响因子:
--
作者:
Y. Honkura;M. Matsushima;N. Oshiman;M. K. Tunçer;Ş. Barış;A. Ito;Y. Iio;A. M. Işikara
通讯作者:
Y. Honkura;M. Matsushima;N. Oshiman;M. K. Tunçer;Ş. Barış;A. Ito;Y. Iio;A. M. Işikara