Ethics in Autoethnography and Collaborative Autoethnography
Ethics in Autoethnography and Collaborative Autoethnography
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1077800417704462
复制
发表时间：
2017-10-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Lapadat, Judith C.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lapadat, Judith C.
自我民族志作为一种研究方法获得了广泛的关注，部分原因是它解决了代表、代表或挪用他人声音的伦理问题。在这篇文章中，我将自我民族志的出现置于其历史背景中，并讨论了作为一种调查方法的自我民族志的贡献和局限性。我研究了自我民族志的伦理方面，展示了这种方法是如何根植于伦理意图的，然而，自我民族志作者仍然面临着伦理挑战。我建议合作的自我民族志，一种多声音的方法，两个或更多的研究人员一起工作，分享个人故事，解释汇集的自我民族志数据，建立并扩展了自我民族志的范围，并解决了一些方法和伦理问题。特别是，协作式的自我民族志支持从个人向集体代理的转变，从而为个人参与、非剥削性、可访问的研究提供了一条途径，从而产生了影响。
Autoethnography as an approach to inquiry has gained a widespread following in part because it addresses the ethical issue of representing, speaking for, or appropriating the voice of others. In this article, I place the emergence of autoethnography within its historical context and discuss the contributions and limitations of autoethnography as an approach to inquiry. I examine ethical aspects of autoethnography, showing how the method is rooted in ethical intent, yet autoethnographers nevertheless face ethical challenges. I suggest that collaborative autoethnography, a multivocal approach in which two or more researchers work together to share personal stories and interpret the pooled autoethnographic data, builds upon and extends the reach of autoethnography and addresses some of its methodological and ethical issues. In particular, collaborative autoethnography supports a shift from individual to collective agency, thereby offering a path toward personally engaging, nonexploitative, accessible research that makes a difference.