AVOIDING THE HORRID AND BEASTLY SIN OF DRUNKENNESS - DOES DISSUASION MAKE A DIFFERENCE
AVOIDING THE HORRID AND BEASTLY SIN OF DRUNKENNESS - DOES DISSUASION MAKE A DIFFERENCE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-006x.62.6.1127
复制
发表时间：
1994-12-01
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
BABOR, TF
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BABOR, TF
大约3个世纪前，一位匿名的英国作家准备了一本教育手册，劝阻酗酒者远离“可怕的、可怕的醉酒罪”(匿名者，1705)。在过去的20年里，在12个国家进行了超过25项随机试验，以评估两个基本问题：(A)劝阻起作用了吗？(B)哪种劝阻效果最好？在回答第一个问题时，研究表明，劝阻确实对没有严重酒精依赖的酗酒者起到了作用。关于第二个问题，由于在比较不同干预措施时遇到的实际和方法问题，证据更加模棱两可。结论是，有时归因于特定的行为和心理干预的变化可能是由于建议、个人动机和非特定的社会影响的组合。
Nearly 3 centuries ago, an anonymous English author prepared an educational brochure to dissuade problem drinkers from the ''horrid and beastly sin of drunkenness'' (Anonymous, 1705). During the past 2 decades, more than 25 randomized trials have been conducted in 12 countries to evaluate 2 basic questions: (a) Does dissuasion make a difference, and (b) What kinds of dissuasion work best? In response to the first question, studies indicate that dissuasion does make a difference with heavy drinkers who have not developed severe alcohol dependence. In response to the second question, the evidence is more equivocal because of the practical and methodological problems encountered in the comparison of different interventions. It is concluded that changes sometimes attributed to specific behavioral and psychological interventions may be due to a combination of advice, individual motivation, and nonspecific social influence.