Self-Governance or Professionalized Paternalism?: The Police, Contractual Injunctions and the Differential Management of Deviant Populations
Self-Governance or Professionalized Paternalism?: The Police, Contractual Injunctions and the Differential Management of Deviant Populations
复制标题
自治还是专业化的家长作风？：警察、合同禁令和对异常人群的差别化管理
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. McCarthy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. McCarthy
契约禁令已成为社会控制的主要工具。这些禁令赋予警察等机构独特的权力，通过威胁违反禁令将受到刑事制裁，迫使接受者自我控制自己的行为，从而管理异常者。本文发展的理解，如何合同禁令实际上是在实践中使用的警察。合同禁令是针对某些社会群体的不同方式的分析是在警察职业文化的限制和可能性，他们的应用。它的结论是定位更广泛的社会影响的合同禁令与城市边缘化和日益增长的权力，以刑事犯罪的社会困境的问题。
Contractual injunctions have emerged as key instruments of social control. They provide agencies such as the police with unique powers to manage deviant persons by forcing the recipients, via the threat of criminal sanction on breach of the injunction, to engage in self-control of their behaviour. This article develops understandings of how contractual injunctions are actually used in practice by the police. Analyses of the different ways contractual injunctions are directed at certain social groups are developed in relation to police occupational cultures that place limits and possibilities on their application. It concludes by locating the broader social effects of contractual injunctions with issues of urban marginality and growing powers to criminalize social predicaments.