Nitrogen Isotopes in Palaeolimnology
Nitrogen Isotopes in Palaeolimnology
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/0-306-47670-3_15
复制
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Talbot
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Talbot
Nitrogen is a small but essential constituent of all organisms and as such can be regarded as a key nutrient. Together with phosphorous and silicon, it is commonly viewed as one of the nutrients that ultimately limit organic productivity. Indeed, in many lakes, N is probably the limiting nutrient. The fundamental role of nitrogen in organic production means that changes in N sources or cycling commonly have far-reaching consequences for the production, composition and accumulation of sedimentary organic matter (OM) in lakes. Knowledge of past variations in these and other aspects of the N cycle may thus provide unique palaeolimnological information that can be related to regional or global environmental change. A comprehensive overview of the central importance of N to all organic life, and of the N biogeochemical cycle, is given in Schlesinger (1997). Nitrogen in lacustrine sediments has traditionally been characterised either as weight percent total nitrogen (TN) or by the carbon: nitrogen ratio (C/N). The latter is also commonly regarded as a means of identifying the source of the OM (eg, Meyers & Ishiwatari, 1993; Tyson, 1995; Meyers & Lallier-Vergès, 1999). In palaeolimnology considerably less use has been made of N-isotope analysis as a method of characterising sedimentary nitrogen, even though the necessary analytical techniques and isotope fractionation effects have been known for over 40 years (Hoering, 1955; Létolle, 1980; Owens, 1987). There are two principal reasons for this, one practical, the other interpretational. Until comparatively recently, very few laboratories were equipped to carry out nitrogen isotope analyses and in those that were, the number of analyses that could be performed was commonly limited, because of the laborious, offline sample preparation. Interpretational problems were related to the fact that measured isotopic values may not necessarily have an unambiguous solution, due to the variety of biogeochemical processes and N sources that can contribute to the production of sedimentary OM. The situation has changed radically over the last decade, thanks to faster and improved analytical techniques and the growing realisation that even apparently ambiguous N-isotopic values may be interpretable when combined with other sorts of geochemical data.