The criterion-calibration model of cue interaction in contingency judgments
The criterion-calibration model of cue interaction in contingency judgments
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/s13420-011-0015-9
复制
发表时间：
2011-06-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Allan, Lorraine G.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hannah, Samuel D.;Allan, Lorraine G.
Siegel、Allan、Hannah和Crump（2009）证明，人类偶然性判断中的线索交互效应反映了信息获取后发生的处理。这一发现与一大类理论相冲突。我们提出了一个新的postacquisition模型，标准校准模型，它描述了线索的相互作用的影响，涉及报告标准的转变。该模型解释了Siegel等人的数据，并优于唯一的另一个线索相互作用的后获得模型，Stout和米勒（2007）的SOCR模型。我们提出了新的实验数据，旨在评估预测的两个模型相互提示的相互作用的影响。新的数据为标准校准模型提供了进一步的支持。
Siegel, Allan, Hannah, and Crump (2009) demonstrated that cue interaction effects in human contingency judgments reflect processing that occurs after the acquisition of information. This finding is in conflict with a broad class of theories. We present a new postacquisition model, the criterion-calibration model, that describes cue interaction effects as involving shifts in a report criterion. The model accounts for the Siegel et al. data and outperforms the only other postacquisition model of cue interaction, Stout and Miller's (2007) SOCR model. We present new data from an experiment designed to evaluate a prediction of the two models regarding reciprocal cue interaction effects. The new data provide further support for the criterion-calibration model.