Evaluating the quality of research activities: Investigating into the uniqueness
Evaluating the quality of research activities: Investigating into the uniqueness
复制标题
评估研究活动的质量：调查独特性
DOI：
10.33186/1027-3689-2018-10-5-21
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Glavchev
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yu. N. Glavcheva;O. Kanishcheva;M. Glavchev
今天，科学家和研究机构的研究活动是通过非计量方法（文献计量学）来估计的，其中有绝对和相对指标，基于科学计量数据库中的出版物数量及其引用。主要作者和研究机构获得资助和奖励，成为国际获奖者，获得财政支持或其他红利。作者认为，研究活动评价方法影响了作者的行为，增加了剽窃、操纵引用和学术不诚实。欺诈行为歪曲了对研究活动质量和学科现状和出版活动的估计。对问题进行了分析；同时使用文献计量学方法和现代最先进的科学方法来定义写作风格，建议作为一个解决方案。作者强调，传统上图书馆的作用是教育、普及知识和提供信息。今天，他们不得不进入非传统的功能，即支持语言学研究和建立语言语料库。这将防止在用文献计量学方法估计出版活动时被操纵，并将促进学术实践中的学术诚实。
Today, the research activities of scientists and research organizations is estimated through the informetrical methods (bibliometrics) with absolute and relative indicators based on the number of publications and their citations in scientometric databases. The leading authors and research organizations are given grants and awards, become international laureates, get financial support or other dividends. The authors argue that the method of research activities evaluation influences the authors’ behavior and increases plagiarism, rigged citation and academic dishonesty.The fraud practices misrepresent the estimations of research activities quality and the current status of a discipline and publication activities. The problem is analyzed; simultaneous use of bibliometric methods and most advanced scientific methods of modern methods of defining writing styles is suggested as a solution. The authors emphasize that traditionally libraries are meant to educate, to popularize knowledge and to inform. Today, they have to go into non-traditional functions, i.e. to support linguistic research and to build linguistic corpora. This would prevent manipulations when estimating publication activities with bibliometric methods and would promote academic honesty in academic practices.