General discussion: Aerosol formation and growth; VOC sources and secondary organic aerosols.
General discussion: Aerosol formation and growth; VOC sources and secondary organic aerosols.
复制标题
一般性讨论:气溶胶的形成和增长;
DOI:
10.1039/d1fd90011k
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Alam MS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Alam MS
Roy Harrison opened the discussion of the paper by Markku Kulmala: Thanks for the extremely interesting presentation. I have one issue with the work; the mechanism you propose looks entirely plausible, but it depends on emissions of dimethylamine, which you conclude come mainly from road traffic. If that’s the case, I would expect this mechanism to be much more prevalent in the city in Beijing, where there is dense traffic, than in the surrounding countryside, yet there’s very little difference in secondary aerosol concentrations. Therefore, I don’t think it holds together so well as a totally coherent explanation for the high levels of haze we see in Beijing due to secondary components. Do you have any thoughts on, essentially, how crucial dimethylamine is? Are there other sources than road traffic?Markku Kulmala responded: Thank you, Roy, for the very good comment and question. It seems that for the initial clustering, DMA and sulphuric acid are the key molecules in urban environments. However, ammonia also plays a crucial role in many environments, and which of these two routes (sulphuric acid+ DMA or sulphuric acid+ ammonia) is more important depends on the relative concentrations of these vapours. On the one hand, DMA is a very effective base and only pretty minor atmospheric concentrations are needed. On the other hand, there are certainly other DMA sources than traffic, such as soils and agriculture. Unfortunately, the DMA sources are not well characterized at the moment.