Reaching a consensus
Reaching a consensus
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s00355-007-0247-y
复制
发表时间：
2007-08
影响因子：
0.9
通讯作者：
Richard Bradley
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Richard Bradley
本文探讨了聚合和审议之间的关系的一些方面，作为在一组indvividian之间就一些问题达成共识的方式。我认为，首先，框架的聚合问题本身产生的信息，个人理性地有义务考虑到别人的判断。其次，聚合理论通常对共识或集体判断的约束，不一定与个人试图更新这些信息所驱动的理性审议过程的结果一致。本文着重于分配问题的特殊情况下，有既定的结果，在聚集理论和审议理论，使这一主张。
This paper explores some aspects of the relation between aggregation and deliberation as ways of achieving a consensus amongst a group of indviduals on some set of issues. I argue firstly that the framing of an aggregation problem itself generates information about the judgements of others that individuals are rationally obliged to take into account. And secondly that the constraints which aggregation theories typically place on consensual or collective judgements need not be consistent with the outcomes of rational deliberative processes driven by individuals’ attempts to update on this information. The paper focuses on the particular case of allocation problems, for which there are established results both in aggregation theory and deliberation theory, to make this claim.