Brief intervention for hazardous drinking delivered using text messaging: a pilot randomised controlled trial from Goa, India.
Brief intervention for hazardous drinking delivered using text messaging: a pilot randomised controlled trial from Goa, India.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/s1368980022000313
复制
发表时间：
2022-02-18
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Sambari S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nadkarni A;Fernandes D;Bhatia U;Velleman R;D'souza E;D'souza J;Marimilha Pacheco G;Sambari S
评价基于移动设备的简短干预（BI）的可行性和可接受性，生成BI影响的初步估计值，并微调确定性RCT的程序。平行三组单盲个体随机对照初探性试验。合格和知情同意的受试者被随机分配接受基于移动的简短干预（BI）、面对面BI和信息传单。设置：教育机构，工作场所和初级保健中心。成年危险饮酒者。74名参与者被随机分配到三个试验组; 48名（64.9%）完成了结局评价。在任何饮酒结果的变化上，三组之间没有显着差异。但是，存在双向比较。在随访时，面对面BI和移动的BI的PDHD上级活性对照，并且在随访时，移动的BI的每周平均乙醇消耗克数上级活性对照。关于可行性和初步影响的令人鼓舞的发现，保证了我们的干预措施的明确试验，如果发现有效，我们的干预措施可能是对低资源环境中危险饮酒的潜在可扩展的一线应对措施。
To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a mobile-based Brief Intervention (BI), generate preliminary estimates of the impact of the BI, and fine-tune the procedures for a definitive RCT. Parallel three-arm single blind individually randomised controlled pilot trial. Eligible and consenting participants were randomised to receive mobile based Brief Intervention (BI), face-to-face BI, and information leaflet. Setting: Educational institutions, workplaces, and primary care centres. Adult hazardous drinkers. 74 participants were randomised into the three trial arms; 48 (64.9%) completed outcome evaluation. There were no significant differences between the three arms on change in any of the drinking outcomes. There were however in 2-way comparisons. Face-to-face BI and mobile BI were superior to active control for PDHD at follow up, and mobile BI was superior to active control for mean grams ethanol consumed per week at follow up. The encouraging findings about feasibility and preliminary impact, warrant a definitive trial of our intervention and if found to be effective, our intervention could be a potentially scalable first-line response to hazardous drinking in low resource settings.