Rheumatologists have an important role in the management of interstitial lung disease (ILD): a cross-speciality, multi-centre, UK perspective.
Rheumatologists have an important role in the management of interstitial lung disease (ILD): a cross-speciality, multi-centre, UK perspective.
复制标题
风湿病学家在间质性肺疾病 (ILD) 的治疗中发挥着重要作用:从英国的跨专业、多中心角度来看。
DOI:
10.1093/rheumatology/keac061
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Mehta P
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mehta P
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) refers to a heterogeneous and challenging group of diffuse parenchymal lung disorders. ILD, including progressive fibrosing ILD, is a common manifestation of systemic autoimmune CTD and is a leading cause of mortality in many rheumatic conditions [1]. ILD is most frequent in SSc, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and RA, but may also manifest in patients with SS and SLE. The research term interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features was defined in 2015 to classify patients with ILD that may demonstrate clinical, radiological or serological characteristics of CTD, but do not meet formal CTD definitions [2]. However, the value and prognostic relevance of these classification criteria are currently unclear, may reflect limitations of our current rheumatological CTD criteria and demonstrate a growing need for cross-speciality collaboration between rheumatologists and respiratory physicians in ILD clinical practice and research. Respiratory Society guidelines [3, 4] and NHS England commissioning services [5] recommend a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to diagnosis and management of ILD, involving clinical (including respiratory and rheumatology input), radiological and (when indicated) histopathological involvement. Strategies for managing SSc-ILD have considerably advanced in recent years, a testament to dedicated and concerted cross-specialty collaboration; however, progress in other autoimmune ILDs has been slow. Here, as a collective of rheumatologists and respiratory physicians, we describe the important and expanding role of rheumatologists in the management of ILD (Fig. 1) and outline strategies to improve collaborative working and therefore outcomes in patients with ILD.Despite improvement, there remains considerable need to develop better communication and shared learning between rheumatologists and respiratory physicians. One example of shared decision-making is the now debunked issue of MTX-induced ILD. Despite a sufficient body of evidence to assuage concerns regarding fibrotic ILD [6], some reticence and unease remains among clinicians in both fields. Other areas of controversy and often debated among clinicians include the use of MTX for articular disease in patients with concurrent ILD and the rare, but recognized MTX-induced hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The confusion is not limited to MTX. Lung disease in RA is poorly understood, despite it being recognized as prevalent and important,