Questioning the Rules of Continuity Editing: An Empirical Study
Questioning the Rules of Continuity Editing: An Empirical Study
复制标题
质疑连续性编辑的规则：一项实证研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Hermann Kalkofen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Hecht;Hermann Kalkofen
我们研究了电影中动作剪辑的现象连续性。当在动态事件中使用视角变化时，电影导演倾向于同意，如果希望给人留下流畅连续的印象，直截了当的剪辑是不可取的。这样的剪切将体现出从一个相机角度或位置到另一个相机角度或位置的瞬间过渡。一些电影理论家建议，一些重叠的动作是可取的，他们推测视觉系统需要时间来消化剪辑和重新定位。其他人则不同意，他们更喜欢有空档。我们报告了两个实验，它们为相互竞争的连续性假设提供了经验检验。我们系统地改变了一个动态场景的时间参数，这个场景持续了一次相机跳跃。计算机动画序列必须进行调整，直到它们看起来最流畅和时间上正确。观察员非常一致地倾向于使用间隙(省略号)。讨论了对电影剪辑和电影理论的影响。
We investigated phenomenal continuity across mid-action cuts in motion pictures. When a change of perspective is used in the midst of a dynamic event, film directors tend to agree that a straight-match cut is not advisable if the impression of smooth continuity is desired. Such a cut would embody an instantaneous transition from one camera angle or position to the next. Some film theorists recommend that some overlap of the action is desirable, surmising that the visual system needs time to digest the cut and to reorient. Others disagree and prefer a gap. We report two experiments that provide an empirical test of competing continuity hypotheses. We systematically varied the temporal parameters of a dynamic scene that continued across a camera jump. Computer-animated sequences had to be adjusted until they looked maximally smooth and temporally correct. Observers very consistently preferred gaps (ellipses). Implications for film editing and film theory are discussed.
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
FREYD, JJ
通讯作者：
FREYD, JJ