Team Science, Justice, and the Co-Production of Knowledge
Team Science, Justice, and the Co-Production of Knowledge
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/ajcp.12252
复制
发表时间：
2018-09-01
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Tebes, Jacob Kraemer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tebes, Jacob Kraemer
科学越来越多地由基于团队的跨学科研究组成，通过一种被称为团队科学的实践来应对复杂的社会、生物医学、公共卫生和全球挑战。在这篇文章中，我讨论了团队科学的附加值，包括参与式团队科学，以产生科学知识。参与式团队科学涉及将公共利益攸关方纳入科学团队，作为知识的共同生产者。我还讨论了建构主义如何为社区心理学和团队科学提供一个共同的哲学基础，以及这个基础如何与强调共同生产知识的当代科学发展很好地结合起来。最后，我讨论了在团队科学中共同创造知识如何促进正义。亮点跨学科团队科学可以应对社会/生物医学/公共卫生/全球挑战。参与式团队科学是一种将公众利益相关者包括在科学团队中的团队。公众作为知识共同生产者参与科学团队，与当代科学保持一致。在参与式团队科学中共同创造知识可以促进正义。
Science increasingly consists of interdisciplinary team-based research to address complex social, biomedical, public health, and global challenges through a practice known as team science. In this article, I discuss the added value of team science, including participatory team science, for generating scientific knowledge. Participatory team science involves the inclusion of public stakeholders on science teams as co-producers of knowledge. I also discuss how constructivism offers a common philosophical foundation for both community psychology and team science, and how this foundation aligns well with contemporary developments in science that emphasize the co-production of knowledge. I conclude with a discussion of how the co-production of knowledge in team science can promote justice.HighlightsInterdisciplinary team science can address social/biomedical/public health/global challenges. Participatory team science is one type of team that includes public stakeholders on science teams. Public participation on science teams as knowledge co-producers aligns with contemporary science. The co-production of knowledge in participatory team science can promote justice.