Comparative study on institutional designs and performance of national greenhouse gas inventories: the cases of Vietnam and the Philippines
Comparative study on institutional designs and performance of national greenhouse gas inventories: the cases of Vietnam and the Philippines
复制标题
国家温室气体清单制度设计与绩效比较研究：以越南和菲律宾为例
DOI：
10.1007/s10668-019-00460-y
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Fujikura Ryo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kawanishi Masato;Kato Makoto;Matsuda Emiko;Fujikura Manami;Fujikura Ryo
根据《巴黎协定》，透明度框架得到了加强。发展中国家需要发展定期更新国家温室气体(GHG)清单的能力，从而根据其国家自主贡献(NDC)跟踪实现气候变化缓解目标的进展情况。尽管近年来的许多研究侧重于发展中国家在建立更频繁的清单报告所需的长期体制能力方面所面临的挑战，但在分析国家温室气体清单与各自国家的国家发展数据之间的体制联系方面所做的工作很少。在此背景下，我们研究了越南和菲律宾的情况。通过桌面审查和2018年进行的一系列访谈，本研究确定了它们针对国家温室气体清单的机构设计。它还在以下几个方面评估了观察到的机构业绩成果：(1)国家温室气体清单报告的频率和质量，以及(2)国家温室气体清单在指导国家发展方案下制定缓解行动的进程方面的有效性。研究发现，两国在绩效结果上存在差异，这可能与制度设计的差异有关。它还发现了潜在的权衡：一个方面的良好表现结果不一定会转化为另一个方面的类似结果。研究结果对与透明度有关的能力建设援助有影响：对体制安排及其潜在后果的充分了解对于发展伙伴促进国家温室气体清单和发展中国家国家发展政策之间的相互作用十分重要。
A transparency framework has been enhanced under the Paris Agreement. Developing countries need to develop the capacity to regularly update national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories, thereby tracking progress toward climate change mitigation goals under their nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Although much study in recent years has been focused on the challenges faced by developing countries in building the long-term institutional capabilities required for more frequent inventory reporting, little work has been done to analyze the institutional linkage between the national GHG inventories and NDCs in the respective countries. Against this backdrop, we examined the cases of Vietnam and the Philippines. Through desktop reviews and a series of interviews conducted in 2018, the present study characterized their institutional designs for the national GHG inventory. It also evaluated observed outcomes of institutional performance in the following dimensions: (1) the frequency and quality of national GHG inventory reporting and (2) the effectiveness of the national GHG inventory at informing the process to formulate mitigation actions under NDCs. The study found that there are differences in performance outcomes between the two countries, which may be linked to the differences in institutional designs. It also found potential trade-offs: A good performance outcome in one dimension may not necessarily translate into a similar result in the other. The findings have implications for transparency-related capacity building assistance: A sound understanding of institutional arrangements and their potential consequences is important for development partners to facilitate the interplay between the national GHG inventory and NDCs in developing countries.