Models for formalizing customary and community forest lands: The need to integrate livelihoods into rights and forest conservation goals
Models for formalizing customary and community forest lands: The need to integrate livelihoods into rights and forest conservation goals
复制标题
传统林地和社区林地正规化的模式：将生计纳入权利和森林保护目标的必要性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Mwangi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Larson;I. Monterroso;N. Liswanti;T. Herawati;Abwoli Y. Banana;P. Canturias;K. Rivera;E. Mwangi
关键信息对两个主要林权改革制度--指定供社区使用的林地和社区所有的土地--的社区看法进行比较，结果表明，在实地，一种制度的结果并不总是好于另一种制度。印度尼西亚、秘鲁和乌干达的调查结果显示，几乎所有地点的粮食不安全状况令人不安，而且在优先考虑权利和/或养护的情况下，没有对生计问题给予足够的重视。对生计的更大关注要求：(A)提高对农村社区粮食安全和生计需求的认识；(B)将具体的生计目标作为改革目标；以及(C)加强多部门和多层面的协调，以实现这一目标。生活问题应作为森林保有权改革的一个明确目标纳入，并作为评估改革的一个可衡量的指标。
Key messagesA comparison of community perceptions across the two main forest tenure reform regimes – forestland designated for community use versus land owned by communities – does not show, on the ground, that one has consistently better outcomes than the other. This is likely due to multiple weaknesses in both types of reforms and the need to better integrate rights, conservation and livelihoods goals.Survey results from Indonesia, Peru and Uganda show a disturbing level of food insecurity across almost all sites and, with prioritization of rights and/or conservation, a failure to pay sufficient attention to livelihoods concerns.Greater attention to livelihoods requires: (a) increased awareness of food security and livelihoods needs in rural communities; (b) specific livelihoods goals as an objective of reforms; and (c) greater multisectoral and multilevel coordination in order to bring this about.Livelihoods concerns should be incorporated as a clear goal in forest tenure reforms and as a measurable indicator in efforts to evaluate reforms.