Towards a synergy framework across neuroscience and robotics: Lessons learned and open questions. Reply to comments on: "Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands".
Towards a synergy framework across neuroscience and robotics: Lessons learned and open questions. Reply to comments on: "Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands".
复制标题
迈向神经科学和机器人技术的协同框架：经验教训和开放性问题。
DOI：
10.1016/j.plrev.2016.06.007
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
11.7
通讯作者：
Castellini,Claudi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Santello,Marco;Bianchi,Matteo;Gabiccini,Marco;Ricciardi,Emiliano;Salvietti,Gionata;Prattichizzo,Domenico;Ernst,Marc;Moscatelli,Alessandro;Jorntell,Henrik;Kappers,AstridML;Kyriakopoulos,Kostas;Schaeffer,AlinAbu;Castellini,Claudi
在过去的几十年里，脑功能成像方法的快速发展使得认知神经科学能够解决哲学和社会科学中的开放性问题。与此同时，认知神经科学研究的新见解开始影响各个学科，导致规划和建筑设计领域转向认知和情感。自2003年以来，神经科学建筑学院一直支持“神经建筑”作为一种将神经科学与对建筑环境的行为反应研究联系起来的方式。在许多与多感官知觉整合和体现相关的话题中，触觉概念最近被引入，表明触觉感知和触觉图像在建筑评价中起着关键作用。因此，在人类大脑的触觉和超模态功能结构之间存在着共同的认知基础，这一观点得到了支持。准确地说，超模态是指被定义的大脑区域以更抽象的方式处理和表示特定信息内容的功能特征，而独立于向大脑传递这些信息的感觉模态。在这里，我们根据建筑学和认知神经科学的不同视角，强调了触觉和超模态概念之间的一些共同点和差异。这两种不同方法之间的比较和联系可能会导致关于人与环境关系的新观察，甚至为更新的循证设计理论提供经验基础。
In the last decades, the rapid growth of functional brain imaging methodologies allowed cognitive neuroscience to address open questions in philosophy and social sciences. At the same time, novel insights from cognitive neuroscience research have begun to influence various disciplines, leading to a turn to cognition and emotion in the fields of planning and architectural design. Since 2003, the Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture has been supporting ‘neuro-architecture’ as a way to connect neuroscience and the study of behavioral responses to the built environment. Among the many topics related to multisensory perceptual integration and embodiment, the concept of hapticity was recently introduced, suggesting a pivotal role of tactile perception and haptic imagery in architectural appraisal. Arguments have thus risen in favor of the existence of shared cognitive foundations between hapticity and the supramodal functional architecture of the human brain. Precisely, supramodality refers to the functional feature of defined brain regions to process and represent specific information content in a more abstract way, independently of the sensory modality conveying such information to the brain. Here, we highlight some commonalities and differences between the concepts of hapticity and supramodality according to the distinctive perspectives of architecture and cognitive neuroscience. This comparison and connection between these two different approaches may lead to novel observations in regard to people–environment relationships, and even provide empirical foundations for a renewed evidence-based design theory.