“The question of belief”: writing poststructural ethnography
“The question of belief”: writing poststructural ethnography
复制标题
“信仰问题”：撰写后结构民族志
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Deborah P. Britzman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Deborah P. Britzman
本文涉及当前关于民族志表征的后结构性辩论。它质疑三种类型的民族志权威：经验主义的权威、语言的权威和阅读的权威。在进行一种自我思辨批评的过程中，作者深入到她自己的民族志《实践创造实践：教学学习的批判性研究》的幕后，思考后结构理论对民族志写作的“作用”问题。关于后结构辩论如何形成解释努力，阐述了两个相关主题：后结构教学研究中的概念问题和民族志叙事生产中的理论问题。是否存在一种超越人文主义约束的教育民族志？如果民族志学者不仅开始质疑他人的话语，而且开始探讨使民族志变得可理解的话语与民族志报告之间的关系，结果会怎样呢？
This article engages current poststructural debates over ethnographic representation. It questions three types of ethnographic authority: the authority of empiricism, the authority of language, and the authority of reading. In performing a form of self‐speculative critique, the author moves behind the scenes of her own ethnography, Practice Makes Practice: A Critical Study of Learning to Teach, to consider the problem of what poststructural theories “do” to ethnographic writing. Two related themes are elaborated in relation to how poststructural debates fashioned interpretive efforts: conceptual issues in the poststructural study of teaching and theoretical issues in the production of ethnographic narratives. Can there be an educational ethnography that exceeds the constraints of humanism? What if the ethnographer began not just to question the discourse of others but to engage the relation between the discourses that render ethnography intelligible and the ethnographic report?