Non-target Effects of Biological Control Agents
Non-target Effects of Biological Control Agents
复制标题
生物防治剂的非目标效应
DOI:
10.1007/978-94-011-4014-0_13
复制
发表时间:
2000
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
F. Howarth
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
F. Howarth
Biological control uses three strategies: management practices to enhance native agents already occurring in the system (Chapter 4); captive rearing and release of resident native agents (Chapter 3); and importation and release of non-native agents (sometimes termed'classical biological control')(Chapter 2). A fourth strategy is rapidly being developed: genetic manipulation of both native and non-native agents to enhance their effectiveness against pests (see Chapter 14). An important measure of successful pest control is the effect of the control procedure on the environment, including any direct and indirect effects on non-target species. Although biological control is frequently presumed to be safe to the environment (Lai, 1988; Coulson et al., 1991; US Congress, 1995; Bathon, 1996; Onstad and McManus, 1996; McEvoy, 1996; Jervis 1997), all pest control methods have inherent risks. That is, any method that reduces the popUlation of an abundant pest organism to below an economic threshold will have community-level effects and therefore will inherently pose environmental risks. The scope of this chapter is to review the published evidence for environmental impacts of biological control on non-target organisms and to suggest ways of minimising the inherent risks. In the context of this book, non-target effects are important for they have the potential to compromise the success of biological control. The effects of non-indigenous agents will be stressed here because, in practice, introduced agents are nearly always permanent additions to the new environment. This makes some impacts potentially irreversible and