Efficient and Unbiased Sampling of Biomolecular Systems in the Canonical Ensemble: A Review of Self-Guided Langevin Dynamics.
Efficient and Unbiased Sampling of Biomolecular Systems in the Canonical Ensemble: A Review of Self-Guided Langevin Dynamics.
复制标题
规范系综中生物分子系统的高效和无偏采样:自引导朗之万动力学综述。
DOI:
10.1002/9781118197714.ch6
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Brooks,BernardR
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wu,Xiongwu;Damjanovic,Ana;Brooks,BernardR
Conformational search is problematic for simulation systems where populated states are either separated by energy barriers or kinetic bottlenecks or are spread across a distance that corresponds to significant conformational changes. In biological systems, conformational search is very challenging because biological molecules such as proteins or DNA have a huge conformational space and numerous energy barriers. Biological relevant events, such as protein folding [1], ligand binding, conformational signal transduction, and so on, occur in a timescale far exceeding that accessible by current realistic simulations [2]. The conformation search problem for macromolecules has been the subject of intense efforts for many decades. There are numerous methods and approaches, each with various strengths and weaknesses, and there are several review articles that survey these methods rather well [3–9]. Among the many methods for efficient conformational search, the self-guided molecular dynamic (SGMD)[10, 11] and the self-guided Langevin dynamics (SGLD)[12–14] simulation methods are somewhat unique. The term “self-guided” refers to the manner in which the information learned during a simulation is used to enhance the conformational search of the very same simulation. The core of these methods is the use of local averages of force and momentum as a guiding force that accelerates barrier crossing in a manner that can also preserve the canonical ensemble. Even though these methods have been discussed in studies by Norberg and Nilsson [8], Tai [9], and Christen and Van Gunsteren [3], this chapter presents a more complete description that includes recent developments. To better understand how SGLD relates to the many other sampling and search methods, it is worthwhile to categorize sampling methods by considering the following nine questions for which we contrast SGLD with alternative methods: