How to ... be reflexive when conducting qualitative research
How to ... be reflexive when conducting qualitative research
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/tct.13133
复制
发表时间：
2020-02-01
期刊：
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Johnston, Jenny
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Barrett, Aileen;Kajamaa, Anu;Johnston, Jenny
当进入定性研究的世界时，自反性可能是一个复杂的概念。在这篇文章中，我们的目的是鼓励新的定性研究人员成为反思，因为他们发展自己的批判性研究技能，反思和反思实践和反思性的熟悉的概念之间的区别。尽管反思实际上是一种以改进实践为目的的目标导向的行动，但反思是一个持续的过程，它涉及并阐明研究者的位置和研究的背景。它还涉及挑战和阐明影响这一背景的社会和文化影响和动态。作为高质量定性研究的标志，反思性不仅是一个个体过程，而且需要被视为研究团队中的集体过程，并在整个研究过程中进行沟通。为了与本系列的前几篇文章保持一致，我们已经用已发表研究的实际例子说明了反身性的理论概念。
Reflexivity can be a complex concept to grasp when entering the world of qualitative research. In this article, we aim to encourage new qualitative researchers to become reflexive as they develop their critical research skills, differentiating between the familiar concept of reflection and reflective practice and that of reflexivity. Although reflection is, to all intents and purposes, a goal-oriented action with the aim of improving practice, reflexivity is a continual process of engaging with and articulating the place of the researcher and the context of the research. It also involves challenging and articulating social and cultural influences and dynamics that affect this context. As a hallmark of high-quality qualitative research, reflexivity is not only an individual process but one that needs to be considered a collective process within a research team, and communicated throughout the research process. In keeping with our previous articles in this series, we have illustrated the theoretical concept of reflexivity using practical examples of published research.