Assessment of a Crowdsourcing Open Call for Approaches to University Community Engagement and Strategic Planning During COVID-19.

Assessment of a Crowdsourcing Open Call for Approaches to University Community Engagement and Strategic Planning During COVID-19.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10090
复制
发表时间:
2021-05-03
期刊:
影响因子:
13.8
通讯作者:
Tucker JD
Tucker JD
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Day S;Li C;Hlatshwako TG;Abu-Hijleh F;Han L;Deitelzweig C;Bayus B;Ramaswamy R;Tang W;Tucker JD

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

众包公开呼吁是否是让大学社区参与COVID-19安全策略的可行方法?这项定性研究评估了82份提交给大学的公开呼吁,要求学生,教师和工作人员提供创造性的解决方案,以告知2020年秋季学期的安全。与大学领导层分享了解决方案,并正在进一步制定一些解决方案。这项研究的结果表明,公开呼吁是一种很有前途的方法,可以了解大学社区成员的关切,并确定在大流行期间安全的大学活动的由利益相关者驱动的创新解决方案。在COVID-19期间重塑大学生活需要大量创新和有意义的社区投入。获取社区意见的一种方法是众包,即让一群人共同解决一个问题,然后公开分享解决方案。评估众包公开征集作为COVID-19大学社区参与和战略规划的一种方法。这项定性研究评估了2020年6月16日至7月16日提供的众包公开电话,该电话寻求在查佩尔山的北卡罗来纳州大学2020年秋季学期提供安全信息的想法。使用数字方法(电子邮件和社交媒体)进行推广,并在线收集4周的意见书。参与是开放给学生,工作人员,教师和其他人。对提交的材料进行了创新性、可行性、包容性以及改善安全和福祉的潜力的评估。从提交个人收集人口统计数据,并提交了定性分析与解决安全和福祉在秋季学期的挑战和解决方案的紧急主题。与联合国系统领导层分享数据,为决策提供信息。公开征集收到了来自110名参与者的82份意见书,其中包括当前的非裔学生(56份意见书[68%]),年龄小于30岁的人(67 [82%]),女性(55 [67%])以及被认为是少数种族/民族或多种族/民族的个人(49 [60%])。七个提交被确定为决赛选手,并获得现金奖励,鼓励将这些资金用于创意开发和实施。17支亚军队伍与大学资源挂钩,以进一步发展。对提交的关于秋季学期挑战的专题分析表明,不仅存在身体健康问题和远程学习的局限性,而且还存在因这一流行病而加剧的挑战,如缺乏心理健康支持、结构性种族主义和不平等以及公共交通不足。解决方案包括支持特定人群(如研究生和种族/少数民族)心理健康的新想法,改善健康公平性,并增加过境机会。所有24个决赛和亚军在被告知公开征集结果后都表示有兴趣实施。这项研究表明,公开呼吁是大学社区参与COVID-19的可行策略,提供了一种由利益相关者驱动的方法,以确定有前途的想法,以提高安全和福祉。公开征集可以正式纳入大学规划流程,以制定应对不同社区成员关切的COVID-19安全策略。这项定性研究评估了一项众包公开呼吁,作为大学社区参与和战略规划的一种方法,以确保COVID-19大流行期间的安全。
Is a crowdsourcing open call a feasible approach to engaging the university community in COVID-19 safety strategies? This qualitative study evaluated 82 submissions to a university open call for creative solutions from students, faculty, and staff to inform safety in the fall 2020 semester. Solutions were shared with university leadership, and several are being further developed. The results of this study suggest that open calls are a promising approach to understanding university community members’ concerns and identifying stakeholder-driven, innovative solutions for safe university activity during the pandemic. Reimagining university life during COVID-19 requires substantial innovation and meaningful community input. One method for obtaining community input is crowdsourcing, which involves having a group of individuals work to solve a problem and then publicly share solutions. To evaluate a crowdsourcing open call as an approach to COVID-19 university community engagement and strategic planning. This qualitative study assessed a crowdsourcing open call offered from June 16 to July 16, 2020, that sought ideas to inform safety in the fall 2020 semester at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC). Digital methods (email and social media) were used for promotion, and submissions were collected online for 4 weeks. Participation was open to UNC students, staff, faculty, and others. Submissions were evaluated for innovation, feasibility, inclusivity, and potential to improve safety and well-being. Demographic data were collected from submitting individuals, and submissions were qualitatively analyzed for emergent themes on challenges with and solutions for addressing safety and well-being in the fall semester. Data were shared with UNC leadership to inform decision-making. The open call received 82 submissions from 110 participants, including current UNC students (56 submissions [68%]), people younger than 30 years (67 [82%]), women (55 [67%]), and individuals identifying as a racial/ethnic minority or as multiracial/ethnic (49 [60%]). Seven submissions were identified as finalists and received cash prizes with the encouragement to use these funds toward idea development and implementation. Seventeen runner-up teams were linked to university resources for further development. Thematic analysis of submissions regarding challenges with the fall semester revealed not only physical health concerns and the limitations of remote learning but also challenges that have been exacerbated by the pandemic, such as a lack of mental health support, structural racism and inequality, and insufficient public transportation. Solutions included novel ideas to support mental health among specific populations (eg, graduate students and racial/ethnic minorities), improve health equity, and increase transit access. All 24 finalists and runners-up indicated interest in implementation after being notified of the open call results. This study suggests that open calls are a feasible strategy for university community engagement on COVID-19, providing a stakeholder-driven approach to identifying promising ideas for enhancing safety and well-being. Open calls could be formally incorporated into university planning processes to develop COVID-19 safety strategies that are responsive to diverse community members’ concerns. This qualitative study evaluates a crowdsourcing open call as an approach to university community engagement and strategic planning to ensure safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa815
发表时间: 2021-02-15
影响因子: 11.8
作者:
Tai, Don Bambino Geno;Shah, Aditya;Wieland, Mark L.
通讯作者: Wieland, Mark L.
DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.8259
发表时间: 2017-10-16
影响因子: 5
作者:
Pathanasethpong A;Soomlek C;Morley K;Morley M;Polpinit P;Dagan A;Weis JW;Celi LA
通讯作者: Celi LA
DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000002534
发表时间: 2020-07-01
期刊: AIDS (London, England)
影响因子: --
作者:
Day S;Mathews A;Blumberg M;Vu T;Mason H;Rennie S;Kuruc JD;Gay CL;Margolis DM;Tucker JD
通讯作者: Tucker JD
DOI: 10.1177/1740774520902741
发表时间: 2020-02-03
期刊: CLINICAL TRIALS
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Day, Suzanne;Mathews, Allison;Tucker, Joseph D.
通讯作者: Tucker, Joseph D.
DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000000388
发表时间: 2014-09-01
期刊: ACADEMIC MEDICINE
影响因子: 7.4
作者:
O'Brien, Bridget C.;Harris, Ilene B.;Cook, David A.
通讯作者: Cook, David A.