Narrative thinking lingers in spontaneous thought.
Narrative thinking lingers in spontaneous thought.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1038/s41467-022-32113-6
复制
发表时间：
2022-08-06
影响因子：
16.6
通讯作者：
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
有些经历在脑海中挥之不去，在结束后的几分钟内自发地回到我们的思想中。其他的经历会立刻从脑海中消失。原因尚不清楚。我们假设，当一个输入被深度处理时，它更有可能在我们的思想中持续存在：当我们提取了它的情境意义，而不是它的物理属性或低层次语义时。在这里，参与者阅读具有不同连贯性水平（单词，句子或叙述水平）的单词序列。在阅读前后，我们通过自由联想的方式来探究受试者的自发思维。通过测量徘徊主观（通过自我报告）和客观（通过自由联想内容的变化），我们发现，信息徘徊时，它是连贯的叙事水平。此外，一个人的感觉运输到阅读材料预测逗留比材料的客观连贯性更好。因此，我们当下的想法与先前的经验相呼应，这些经验已经被纳入更深层次的叙事思维形式。有些经历在我们的脑海中挥之不去，而另一些则很快消失。在这里，作者表明，我们最近的经历在随后的思想中停留的程度随着处理深度的增加而增加。
Some experiences linger in mind, spontaneously returning to our thoughts for minutes after their conclusion. Other experiences fall out of mind immediately. It remains unclear why. We hypothesize that an input is more likely to persist in our thoughts when it has been deeply processed: when we have extracted its situational meaning rather than its physical properties or low-level semantics. Here, participants read sequences of words with different levels of coherence (word-, sentence-, or narrative-level). We probe participants’ spontaneous thoughts via free word association, before and after reading. By measuring lingering subjectively (via self-report) and objectively (via changes in free association content), we find that information lingers when it is coherent at the narrative level. Furthermore, and an individual’s feeling of transportation into reading material predicts lingering better than the material’s objective coherence. Thus, our thoughts in the present moment echo prior experiences that have been incorporated into deeper, narrative forms of thinking. Some experiences linger in our minds, while others quickly fade. Here, the authors show that the extent to which our recent experiences linger into subsequent thought increases as a function of processing depth.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
16.2
作者：
Chien, Hsiang-Yun Sherry;Honey, Christopher J.
通讯作者：
Honey, Christopher J.
影响因子：
9.9
作者：
de Gortari, Angelica B. Ortiz;Griffiths, Mark D.
通讯作者：
Griffiths, Mark D.
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Dion, Michelle L.;Sumner, Jane Lawrence;Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin
通讯作者：
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Baria, A. T.;Mansour, A.;Huang, L.;Baliki, M. N.;Cecchi, G. A.;Mesulam, M. M.;Apkarian, A. V.
通讯作者：
Apkarian, A. V.
DOI：
10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80006-9
发表时间：
1972-01-01
期刊：
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR
影响因子：
--
作者：
BRANSFORD, JD;JOHNSON, MK
通讯作者：
JOHNSON, MK