BurnCalc assessment study of computer-aided individual three-dimensional burn area calculation.
BurnCalc assessment study of computer-aided individual three-dimensional burn area calculation.
复制标题
计算机辅助个体三维烧伤面积计算的BurnCalc评估研究
DOI：
10.1186/s12967-014-0242-x
复制
发表时间：
2014-09-10
影响因子：
7.4
通讯作者：
Xia ZF
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sheng WB;Zeng D;Wan Y;Yao L;Tang HT;Xia ZF
背景烧伤面积的准确估计对于液体复苏、手术选择、营养支持和预后的决定至关重要。广泛使用的估计烧伤面积的临床方法是二维的。他们不考虑年龄、性别、体重、身体畸形或其他相关因素。计算机辅助方法通过包括数据分析和减少主观差异，提高了估计烧伤面积的准确性。三维（3D）扫描使我们能够快速和可重复地确定身体尺寸。我们描述了一个个性化的，具有成本效益的，便携式的三维扫描系统，BurnCalc，可以创建一个单独的三维模型，然后计算体表面积（BSA）和烧伤面积准确，快速methodsThe BurnCalc系统进行了验证，通过验证BSA计算的准确性和稳定性。在实验1中，我们测量了10个常规对象，使用学生t检验和组内相关系数（ICC）进行分析。在实验2中，将已知尺寸的人造纸贴片贴在40名志愿者身体的各个部位。然后使用BurnCalc计算它们的大小。将BurnCalc数据与实际测量值进行比较，以验证准确性和稳定性。这40名志愿者的总BSA也由BurnCalc计算，并与从公认的公式得出的结果进行比较。实验三由四名专家采用中国九法或手则法计算17名志愿者体表面积占体表面积的百分比。学生的t-检验和ICC，分别用于比较与BurnCalc technology.ResultsStatistically获得的结果，在实验1中，p =0.834和ICC = 0.999，表明有BurnCalc和真实的测量之间没有差异。此外，测量值之间的零差假设（实验2）是真实的，因为p>0.05和ICC = 0.999，表明使用BurnCalc技术计算总BSA和烧伤面积更准确。BurnCalc程序的可靠性为99.9%。在实验3中，只有BurnCalc法的测量值为p> 0.05（p =0.774），ICC = 0.999。结论BurnCalc技术的读数稳定、准确，可作为一种新的标准临床测量方法。
BackgroundAccurate estimation of a burned area is crucial to decisions about fluid resuscitation, surgical options, nutritional support, and prognosis. Widely used clinical methods to estimate a burn area are two-dimensional. They do not consider age, sex, body mass, physical deformities, or other relevant factors. Computer-aided methods have improved the accuracy of estimating burned areas by including data analysis and reducing subjective differences. Three-dimensional (3D) scanning allows us to determine body dimensions rapidly and reproducibly. We describe an individualized, cost-efficient, portable 3D scanning system, BurnCalc, that can create an individual 3D model and then calculate body surface area (BSA) and the burn area accurately and quickly.MethodsThe BurnCalc system was validated by verifying the accuracy and stability of BSA calculation. We measured 10 regular objects in experiment 1, using Student’s t-test and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in the analysis. In experiment 2, artificial paper patches of known dimensions were attached to various parts of the body of 40 volunteers. Their sizes were then calculated using BurnCalc. The BurnCalc data were compared to actually measured values to verify accuracy and stability. Total BSAs of these 40 volunteers were also calculated by BurnCalc and compared to those derived from an accepted formula. In experiment 3, four experts using Chinese Rule-of-Nines or Rule-of-Palms methods calculated the percentages of the total BSA in 17 volunteers. Student’s t-test and ICC, respectively, were used to compare the results obtained with the BurnCalc technique.ResultsStatistically, in experiment 1,p =0.834 and ICC = 0.999, demonstrating that there was no difference between the BurnCalc and real measurements. Also, the hypothesis of null difference among measures (experiment 2) was true becausep >0.05 and ICC = 0.999, indicating that calculations of the total BSA and the burn area were more accurate using the BurnCalc technology. The reliability of the BurnCalc program was 99.9%. In experiment 3, only the BurnCalc method exhibited values ofp> 0.05 (p =0.774) and ICC = 0.999.ConclusionsBurnCalc technology produced stable, accurate readings, suggesting that BurnCalc could be regarded as a new standard clinical method.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Jose, RM;Roy, DK;Erdmann, M
通讯作者：
Erdmann, M
DOI：
10.1109/34.121791
发表时间：
1992-02-01
影响因子：
23.6
作者：
BESL, PJ;MCKAY, ND
通讯作者：
MCKAY, ND
DOI：
10.1097/00004630-200201000-00011
发表时间：
2002-01-01
期刊：
Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation
影响因子：
--
作者：
Neuwalder, J. M.;Sampson, C.;Orgill, D. P.
通讯作者：
Orgill, D. P.
影响因子：
9
作者：
Taylor, FHL;Levenson, SM;Lund, CC
通讯作者：
Lund, CC
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Amirsheybani, HR;Crecelius, GM;Manders, EK
通讯作者：
Manders, EK