Toward Sustainable Peace: A New Research Agenda for Post-Conflict Natural Resource Management
Toward Sustainable Peace: A New Research Agenda for Post-Conflict Natural Resource Management
复制标题
迈向可持续和平：冲突后自然资源管理的新研究议程
DOI：
10.1162/glep_a_00431
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
Florian Krampe
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Florian Krampe
本论坛反思冲突后自然资源管理的研究现状。它确定了文献中关于环境建设和平的两种主要观点：一种侧重于环境合作，另一种侧重于资源风险。这两种观点都关注冲突后环境中自然资源的可持续管理，并规定将整个环境合作作为促进和平与稳定的手段。然而，这两种观点也有显著的差异：合作观点是基于一种信念，即环境合作有潜力通过溢出效应促进长期和平。然而，资源风险观点认为，内部冲突后可能出现资源引起的不稳定；强调需要通过实施环境合作倡议来减少不稳定。尽管这两种观点都有重大贡献，但都没有对环境建设和平提供任何有凝聚力的理论理解。本文建议及时修订研究议程以解决这一差距。
This forum reflects upon the current state of research on post-conflict natural resource management. It identifies two dominant perspectives on environmental peacebuilding in the literature: one focused on environmental cooperation, the other on resource risk. Both perspectives share a concern for the sustainable management of natural resources in post-conflict settings and prescribe environmental cooperation at large as a means to foster peace and stability. Yet both perspectives also feature notable differences: The cooperation perspective is driven by a faith in the potential of environmental cooperation to contribute to long-term peace through spillover effects. The resource risk perspective, however, recognizes that resource-induced instability may arise after intrastate conflict; stressing the need to mitigate instability by implementing environmental cooperation initiatives. Despite the significant contributions of both perspectives, neither has provided any cohesive theoretical understanding of environmental peacebuilding. This article suggests a timely revision of the research agenda to address this gap.
不平等、不满和内战
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Cederman Lars-Erik
通讯作者：
Cederman Lars-Erik