Response to a letter to the editor by Jia and Teng: remimazolam and postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing elective cardiovascular surgery
Response to a letter to the editor by Jia and Teng: remimazolam and postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing elective cardiovascular surgery
复制标题
回复贾和滕致编辑的信:瑞马唑仑与接受择期心血管手术的老年人术后谵妄
DOI:
10.1007/s00540-022-03154-4
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Nakajima Yoshiki
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aoki Yoshitaka;Nakajima Yoshiki
We appreciate the comments from Jia and Teng on our recently published article entitled “Association between remimazolam and postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing elective cardiovascular surgery: a prospective cohort study”[1, 2]. Reporting this observational study was intended to provide the earliest clinical evidence of the effects of remimazolam on cognitive function. However, we agree that the findings of our study alone do not determine the effects of remimazolam on cognitive function and that additional research is needed. Jia and Teng mention that our study contained an element of bias [1], citing a retrospective cohort study of the incidence of and risk factors for early delirium after cardiac surgery [3]. We disagree with their opinion. Even in the study cited by Jia and Teng, delirium was monitored for 5 days postoperatively, which is consistent with the primary endpoint of our study. We chose 5 days to be consistent with a previously reported randomized controlled trial [4]. Moreover, the primary endpoint in an ongoing randomized controlled trial of remimazolam is delirium within the first 5 postoperative days [5]. The previously reported randomized controlled trial showed that after adjusting for baseline differences, the difference in the mean Mini-MentalState Examination score between patients who developed postoperative delirium and those who did not was significant at 30 days postoperatively [4]. However, the average length of stay was 17–20 days in our study, making 30 days of follow-up for delirium difficult. Furthermore, evaluation of delirium over a long period may be influenced by systemic factors, such as complications unrelated to the choice of anesthetic. Therefore, we believe that it was reasonable to assess delirium during the first 5 postoperative days and do not accept that this setting would have been a source of bias in our study.