Making the Real: Rhetorical Adduction and the Bangladesh Liberation War
Making the Real: Rhetorical Adduction and the Bangladesh Liberation War
复制标题
实现真实：修辞引证与孟加拉国解放战争
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
7.8
通讯作者：
J. O’Mahoney
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. O’Mahoney
摘要是否会改变政治行为者的工作，如果是的，那么如何使用抽象道德推理的纯粹力量，而是试图将竞争的源支持其论点的事实。该论点似乎更令人信服。关于人们如何基于令人信服的理由而不是成本效益分析做出选择的理论，我还使用社会学理论关于人们如何通过“现实测试”的表现解决道德上复杂的情况。关于印度部队撤离的论点意味着没有违反国际规范。
Abstract Do normative arguments change what political actors do and if so, how? Rather than using the pure force of abstract moral reasoning, states often try to move the locus of contestation to an arena where they can make practical progress—the evidence or the empirical facts in support of their argument. This paper analyzes how states try to bolster their position first by constructing an argument in which an action represents part of their argument and then by performing that action to make the argument seem more convincing. I call this mechanism rhetorical adduction. The paper challenges theories of communication that deny a causal role to the content of normative arguments and diverges from a leading view on argumentation that arguments have their effects through persuasion. Integrating strategic argumentation theory with theory from psychology about how people make choices based on compelling reasons rather than cost-benefit analysis, I also use theory from sociology on how people resolve morally complex situations through the performance of “reality tests.” I illustrate the mechanism using a case from the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971 when initial resistance to recognizing the putative state of Bangladesh after India's invasion of East Pakistan was reversed as a result of an argument that Indian troop withdrawal meant that international norms were not violated.
合法化的话语过程：绘制国际刑事法院案件中的说服岛
影响因子：
7.8
作者：
Deitelhoff;Nicole
通讯作者：
Nicole