Pushing the s-Donor Strength in Iridium Pincer Complexes: Bis(silylene) and Bis(germylene) Ligands Are Stronger Donors than Bis(phosphorus(III)) Ligands
Pushing the s-Donor Strength in Iridium Pincer Complexes: Bis(silylene) and Bis(germylene) Ligands Are Stronger Donors than Bis(phosphorus(III)) Ligands
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/anie.201205570
复制
发表时间:
2012-01-01
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Hartwig, John F.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brueck, Andreas;Gallego, Daniel;Hartwig, John F.
The development of new ligands to control the reactivity of transition-metal (TM) centers in complexes is a fundamental goal in organometallic chemistry. The “pincer”(EDE) motif describes tridentate, meridonal coordinating ligands that offer a plethora of opportunities to fine-tune the properties of TM complexes.[1] The arms (E) usually consist of neutral, two-electron Lewis basic donor moieties (for example, E= PR2, NR2, or SR), which are connected over a linker group (often CH2, N, or O) to the neutral or mono-anionic anchoring site (D; for example, a pyridyl or phenyl group). With respect to iridium as the metal center, pincer ligands have been used for the generation of low-coordinated, highly electron-rich complexes used in the activation of strong bonds such as the NÀH of ammonia or aniline,[2] the selective H–D exchange of olefinic protons with deuterobenzene,[3] and alkane dehydrogenation.[4]Pincer ligands containing N-heterocyclic-stabilized divalent silicon (silylenyl) moieties RSi:(R= amidinate or βdiketiminate) instead of the common PR2, NR2, or SR donor arms E appear promising to achieve stronger σ-donating properties, which could facilitate the activation of even less reactive bonds.[5] In fact, the determination of the CO stretching vibrations in [LNi (CO) 3] complexes with sixmembered diketiminate SiII ligands L revealed a A1 band as low as 2046cmÀ1 versus 2056 cmÀ1 for L= PtBu3, and 2052 cmÀ1 for L= 1, 3-bis (2, 6-di-isopropylphenyl) imidazoli-