On deletion rules in Catalan
On deletion rules in Catalan
复制标题
关于加泰罗尼亚语的删除规则
DOI：
10.1075/cilt.123.05mor
复制
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Alfonso Morales
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alfonso Morales
目前正在讨论规则和约束之间的相互作用问题。在许多作者最近的工作中，我们已经目睹了有序规则的一致消除，有利于过滤器或约束，在简单性和解释力方面有相当大的收益（参见。Clements和凯瑟1983; Prince 1984; Kiparsky 1985; Itô 1986; Archangeli和Pulleyblank 1986; Mascaró 1989; Scobbie 1991; Myers 1991）。其中一些工作已经提供了证据，证明删除和插入是特别倾向于从一般原则而不是语言特定规则中推导出来的过程。伊藤（1986）之后，增音和减音被看作是音节化的固定机制，而不是引入或删除音段的规则的结果。语音学的不同陈述方法（科尔曼1991;伯德1990;等），所有人都同意，在音位学允许的过程中，必须禁止删除结构或音位材料。这种方法反对使用任何破坏性的过程。从这个角度来看，我们所能做的就是给一个未指定的单位添加新的语音材料或结构，而不是切断、删除或替换。
The problem of the interaction between rules and constraints is currently under discussion. In recent work by many authors, we have witnessed the consistent elimination of ordered rules in favor of filters or constraints with considerable gains in simplicity and in explanatory power (cf. Clements and Keyser 1983; Prince 1984; Kiparsky 1985; Itô 1986; Archangeli and Pulleyblank 1986; Mascaró 1989; Scobbie 1991; Myers 1991). Some of this work has already provided evidence that deletion and epenthesis are processes especially prone to be derived from general principles instead of language specific rules. After Itô (1986), epenthesis and deletion tend to be seen as a fixing mechanism for syllabification and not as the result of a rule introducing or deleting a segment.The different declarative approaches to phonology (Coleman 1991; Bird 1990; etc.), all agree in that deletion of structure or of phonological material has to be banned from the set of processes allowed in phonology. This approach is against the usage of any destructive process. From this point of view all we are able to do is to add new phonological material or structure to an unspecified unit but never delink, delete, or substitute.