Los Estudios Comparativos: algunas notas históricas, epistemológicas y metodológicas

Los Estudios Comparativos: algunas notas históricas, epistemológicas y metodológicas
复制标题

比较研究:历史记录、认识论和方法论

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
N. Krawczyk
N. Krawczyk
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Juan Ignacio Piovani;N. Krawczyk

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在这篇文章中,一些历史的,认识论和方法论的问题,在社会科学的比较研究的解决,特别是在教育领域。本文的出发点是讨论比较的意义、它的逻辑结构以及它在科学和日常生活中的存在。它遵循介绍和批判性评价的观点比较作为一种科学方法。有人认为,即使拒绝将比较作为一种方法的这种限制性含义,但社会科学内部对比较研究的特殊性也存在一些共识。与此相关,本文更详细地介绍了那些可以被定义为跨背景(跨国家和跨文化)的研究,重点是它们面临的主要方法和技术挑战。社会历史比较的观点,这在教育领域近年来获得了重要性,也进行了讨论。
In this article some historical, epistemological and methodological issues related to comparative studies in the social sciences are addressed, with specific reference to the field of education. The starting point is a discussion of the meaning of comparison, its logical structure and its presence in science and in everyday life. It follows the presentation and critical appraisal of the perspectives regarding comparison as a scientific method. It is argued that, even rejecting this restrictive meaning of comparison as a method, there is some consensus on the specificity of comparative studies within the social sciences. And in relation to them, the article address in more detail those studies that can be defined as trans-contextual (cross-national and cross-cultural), with emphasis on the main methodological and technical challenges they face. The socio-historical comparative perspective, which has gained importance in recent years in the field of education, is also discussed.