Publishing Translations in Fascist Italy
Publishing Translations in Fascist Italy
复制标题
在法西斯意大利出版译本
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. E. Paul
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. E. Paul
哈布斯堡王朝关于伊利里亚人身份的假设是受欢迎的。同样，解释“达尔马提亚”和“达尔马提亚”这两个词的使用方式和背景，将有助于澄清与哈布斯堡王朝、克罗地亚民族主义和亚得里亚海领土的关系。文本暗示了对进步和现代性的不同看法，但自由主义意识形态的传播所产生的经济影响似乎受到了忽视，而自由主义意识形态是哈布斯堡商业政策的基础，也是划定哈布斯堡政治区域的基础。根据她的资料，Reill提出了一个强有力的理由，将1848-1849年的革命作为一个分水岭，提供了导致亚得里亚海东岸和西岸独立民族主义发展的“断裂”（第201页）。但是，正如卢西亚诺·蒙扎利（Luciano Monzali）等学者所证明的那样，要求亚得里亚海政治自治、地区治理和多国主义的呼声在本世纪中叶之后一直回响。瑞尔最大的贡献在于她能够发现19世纪亚得里亚海地区失落的声音，这些声音呼吁建立一个分散的、异质的多民族国家。她有效地挑战了那些宣扬十九世纪上半叶单一国家模式首要地位的人，并展示了亚得里亚海庆祝多样性的国家概念的希望和可能性，以说明亚得里亚海思想家如何寻求促进托马塞奥所说的“兄弟情谊”。在那些此后成为激烈而血腥的民族主义冲突牺牲品的土地上。
Habsburg assumptions regarding Illyrian identity would have been welcome. Similarly, an explanation of the variety of ways and contexts in which the terms ‘Dalmatia’ and ‘Dalmatian’ are used would have helped to clarify relationships to the Habsburg administration, Croatian nationalism and Adriatic territories. The text alludes to varying perceptions of progress and modernity, but the economic effects of the spread of liberal ideologies that formed the foundations for Habsburg commercial policies and the bases for delineating Habsburg political regions seem to receive short shrift. Based on her sources, Reill makes a strong case for the 1848–1849 revolutions as a watershed, providing the ‘rupture’ that led to the development of separate nationalisms on the eastern and western shores of the Adriatic (p. 201). But, as scholars including Luciano Monzali have demonstrated, calls for Adriatic political autonomy, regional governance and multinationalism reverberated well past the mid-century. Reill’s greatest contribution lies in her ability to uncover the lost voices of the nineteenth-century Adriatic that called for a decentralized, heterogeneous multi-national state. She effectively challenges those touting the primacy of the mono-national model in the first half of the nineteenth century and demonstrates the promise and possibilities of an Adriatic conception of nationhood celebrating diversity to illustrate how Adriatic thinkers sought to promote what Tommaseo referred to as the ‘brotherhood of nations’ in lands that have since fallen prey to intense and bloody ethno-nationalist conflicts.