Access, health, re-conhecimento : Co-crafted Brazilian discourses on sustainable food
Access, health, re-conhecimento : Co-crafted Brazilian discourses on sustainable food
复制标题
获取、健康、重新整合：共同撰写的巴西可持续食品话语
DOI：
10.1111/geoj.12562
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Afonso R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Afonso R
关于粮食公正和可持续粮食消费的学术讨论需要参考世界各地的经验贡献和异质概念。本文扩大了与各种声音和知识的对话，不仅植根于特定的政治和社会背景，而且还与国际话语对话的巴西的话语和认识传统。首先，分析了自20世纪90年代中期以来，巴西在粮食公正和可持续粮食消费方面的话语，理论和政策制定的多利益相关者过程。在这一过程中，巴西出现了全球领先的政策倡议，如零饥饿、学校供餐计划、进步的食品指南，以及共同制定的概念，如comida de verdade。2019年，政府换届后，国家粮食理事会和定期会议这一讨论的机构架构被拆除。其次，本文介绍了在解散时与民间社会、政策、企业、媒体和名人影响者等主要利益攸关方进行的30次访谈的数据。关于可持续粮食消费，出现了三个关键的子话语：获取，强调食物权;健康;以及re-conhecimento，我们用这个词来表达多种知识和意识的融合，包括坚持食物的文化作用。在整个访谈过程中，从多利益相关者过程中出现的共同制作的概念和短语引起了反响。本文认为，多利益相关者进程不仅在有利的政策环境时期形成了一致的共同话语、概念和政策，而且还形成了集体韧性。围绕这一公共问题的共同想法和承诺的无形大厦仍然完好无损，今后可能会重新启动。在政治两极分化加剧的时代，不仅仅是在巴西，这是投资于这种长期多利益相关者对话进程的重要论据。
Academic discourse on food justice and sustainable food consumption needs to be informed by empirical contributions and heterogenous conceptualisations from diverse parts of the world. This paper broadens the dialogue with a variety of voices and knowledges, rooting itself not only in the specific political and social context, but also the discursive and epistemic traditions of Brazil, which stand in dialogue with international discourses. Firstly, an analysis is offered of the multi‐stakeholder process that since the mid‐1990s shaped the discourse, theorisation and policy making on food justice and sustainable food consumption in Brazil. Emerging from this process were globally leading Brazilian policy initiatives such as Zero Hunger, the School Feeding Program, the progressive Food Guide, and co‐crafted concepts such as comida de verdade. The institutional architecture for this discourse, the National Food Council and regular conferences, were dismantled in 2019 after a change in government. Secondly, the paper presents data from 30 interviews with key stakeholders from civil society, policy, business, media and celebrity influencers, conducted at the time of the dissolution. Three key subdiscourses on sustainable food consumption emerge: access, with an emphasis on right to food; health; and re‐conhecimento, a term we use to articulate the confluence of multiple knowledges and consciousnesses, including an insistence on the cultural role of food. Throughout the interviews, co‐crafted concepts and phrases emerging from the multistakeholder process reverberated. The paper argues that the multi‐stakeholder process resulted not just in a coherent shared discourse, concepts and policy during a period of conducive policy environment, but also in collective resilience. The invisible edifice of shared ideas and commitments around this public issue is still intact and may be reactivated in future. In times of increased political polarisation, not just in Brazil, this is an important argument for investing in such long‐term multi‐stakeholder dialogue processes.