"Nature Does Things Well, Why Should We Interfere?": Vaccine Hesitancy Among Mothers

"Nature Does Things Well, Why Should We Interfere?": Vaccine Hesitancy Among Mothers
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/1049732315573207
复制
发表时间:
2016-02-01
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Guay, Maryse
Guay, Maryse
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dube, Eve;Vivion, Maryline;Guay, Maryse

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

家长使用疫苗接种服务的决定是复杂且多因素的。特别令人感兴趣的是对疫苗犹豫不决的父母,他们处于接受和拒绝疫苗之间的连续区间。这项定性纵向研究的目的是更好地理解为什么母亲选择给新生儿接种疫苗。居住在加拿大魁北克省不同地区的 56 名怀孕母亲接受了采访。这些访谈收集了有关母亲对健康和疫苗接种的看法的信息。几乎一半的母亲被归类为对疫苗犹豫不决。在出生后 3 至 11 个月对这些母亲进行了第二次访谈,以了解她们关于疫苗接种的实际决定和行为。我们的结果表明影响疫苗决策的因素存在异质性。尽管大多数对疫苗犹豫不决的母亲最终选择遵循为孩子推荐的疫苗接种时间表,但她们仍然很矛盾,并继续质疑自己的决定。
Parents' decision to use vaccination services is complex and multi-factorial. Of particular interest are vaccine-hesitant parents who are in the middle of the continuum between vaccine acceptance and refusal. The objective of this qualitative longitudinal study was to better understand why mothers choose to vaccinateor nottheir newborns. Fifty-six pregnant mothers living in different areas of Quebec (Canada) were interviewed. These interviews gathered information on mothers' views about health and vaccination. Almost half of the mothers were categorized as vaccine-hesitant. A second interview was conducted with these mothers 3 to 11 months after birth to look at their actual decision and behavior concerning vaccination. Our results show the heterogeneity of factors influencing vaccine decision making. Although the majority of vaccine-hesitant mothers finally chose to follow the recommended vaccine schedule for their child, they were still ambivalent and they continued to question their decision.