Deciding about decision models of remember and know judgments: a reply to Murdock (2006).
Deciding about decision models of remember and know judgments: a reply to Murdock (2006).
复制标题
决定记住和知道判断的决策模型:对 Murdock (2006) 的答复。
DOI:
10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.657
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Rotello,CarenM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Macmillan,NeilA;Rotello,CarenM
BB Murdock (2006; see record 2006-08257-009) has interpreted remember-know data within a decision space defined by item and associative information, the fundamental variables in his general recognition memory model TODAM (BB Murdock, 1982). He has related parameters of this extended model to stimulus characteristics for several classic remember-know data sets. The authors show that this accomplishment is shared by both one-and two-dimensional signal-detection-based remember-know models (JC Dunn, 2004; CM Rotello, NA Macmillan, & JA Reeder, 2004; JT Wixted & V. Stretch, 2004), which can be represented in this same decision space and can be related to stimulus characteristics with similar success. Murdock claims that his model, unlike its competitors, is a process model; however, the process aspects of TODAM are not used in his application, and the decision aspects are identical to a previously proposed model. Murdock's claim that one competing model (STREAK; CM Rotello et al., 2004) is not fully specified is shown to be false. The new model is not superior to existing ones, but comparisons among the models to date are not definitive. The authors describe several strategies that might be applied to distinguish among them.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)