Reframing Internalized Oppression and Internalized Domination: From the Psychological to the Sociocultural.
Reframing Internalized Oppression and Internalized Domination: From the Psychological to the Sociocultural.
复制标题
重新定义内在的压迫和内在的统治：从心理到社会文化。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Tappan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Tappan
本文提出了对“内在压迫”和“内在统治”的重新解释，不是作为内在的心理品质或特征，而是作为社会文化现象，即作为“中介行动”的形式。中介行动包含两个核心要素：（1）代理人，即执行行动的人，以及（2）文化工具（或“中介手段”），从文化中挪用并由代理人用来完成任务的工具、手段或工具。给定的动作。这种重新构建导致了挪用压迫和挪用统治/特权的新概念，这两者对批判教育学的实践，特别是所谓的反压迫教育具有重大意义。
This article presents a reinterpretation of ‘‘internalized oppression’’ and ‘‘internalized domination,’’ not as internal, psychological qualities or characteristics, but rather as sociocultural phenomena—that is, as forms of ‘‘mediated action.’’ Mediated action entails two central elements: (1) an agent, the person who is doing the acting, and (2) cultural tools (or ‘‘mediational means’’), the tools, means, or instruments appropriated from the culture and used by the agent to accomplish a given action. Such a reframing leads to a new conception of appropriated oppression and appropriated domination/ privilege, both of which have significant implications for the practice of critical pedagogy in general, and what has come to be called antioppressive education in particular.