The Efficiency and Accuracy of The Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1, Errors on the First 10 Items of The Test of Memory Malingering, and Five Embedded Measures in Predicting Invalid Test Performance
The Efficiency and Accuracy of The Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1, Errors on the First 10 Items of The Test of Memory Malingering, and Five Embedded Measures in Predicting Invalid Test Performance
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/arclin/acs044
复制
发表时间：
2012-06-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Denning, John H.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Denning, John H.
本研究试图通过使用两个简短的表格(TOMM试验1或TOMM1；以及TOMM1或TOMMe10的前10个项目的错误)来提高记忆伪装测试(TOMM)的效率和准确性。此外，我们交叉验证了在伪装研究中经常使用的五种嵌入测量的准确性。TOMM1和TOMMe10在预测试验有效性方面具有很高的准确性(曲线下面积分别为92和87；TOMM1 40和TOMMe10 epsilon 1；敏感度70和特异度90)。五个嵌入测量的Logistic回归表明，与单独或联合使用任何单个嵌入测量相比，准确性更高(AuC87)。TOMM1和TOMMe10提供的证据表明，与标准的Tomm管理相比，TOMM1和TOMMe10对无效测试表现的敏感度更高，并且回归的使用提高了五项嵌入式认知测量的准确性。
The current study attempted to improve upon the efficiency and accuracy of one of the most frequently administered measures of test validity, the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) by utilizing two short forms (TOMM trial 1 or TOMM1; and errors on the first 10 items of TOMM1 or TOMMe10). In addition, we cross-validated the accuracy of five embedded measures frequently used in malingering research. TOMM1 and TOMMe10 were highly accurate in predicting test validity (area under the curve [AUC] 92 and 87, respectively; TOMM1 40 and TOMMe10 epsilon 1; sensitivities 70 and specificities 90). A logistic regression of five embedded measures showed better accuracy compared with any individual embedded measure alone or in combination (AUC 87). TOMM1 and TOMMe10 provide evidence of greater sensitivity to invalid test performance compared with the standard TOMM administration and the use of regression improved the accuracy of the five embedded cognitive measures.