Tool Orientation Planning in Milling With Process Dynamic Constraints: A Minimax Optimization Approach
Tool Orientation Planning in Milling With Process Dynamic Constraints: A Minimax Optimization Approach
复制标题
具有过程动态约束的铣削中的刀具方向规划:极小极大优化方法
DOI:
10.1115/1.4040872
复制
发表时间:
2018-07
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ding Han
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Huang Tao;Zhang Xiao-Ming;Leopold Juergen;Ding Han
In five-axis milling process, the tool path generated by a commercial software seldom takes the dynamics of the machining process into account. The neglect of process dynamics may lead to milling chatter, which causes overcut, quick tool wear, etc., and thus damages workpiece surface and shortens tool life. This motivates us to consider dynamic constraints in the tool path generation. Tool orientation variations in five-axis ball-end milling influence chatter stability and surface location error (SLE) due to the varying tool-workpiece immersion area and cutting force, which inversely provides us a feasible and flexible way to suppress chatter and SLE. However, tool orientations adjustment for suppression of chatter and SLE may cause drastic changes of the tool orientations and affects surface quality. The challenge is to strike a balance between the smooth tool orientations and suppression of chatter and SLE. To overcome the challenge, this paper presents a minimax optimization approach for planning tool orientations. The optimization objective is to obtain smooth tool orientations, by minimizing the maximum variation of the rotational angles between adjacent cutter locations, with constraints of chatter-free and SLE threshold. A dedicated designed ball-end milling experiment is conducted to validate the proposed approach. The work provides new insight into the tool path generation for ball-end milling of sculpture surface; also it would be helpful to decision-making for process parameters optimization in practical complex parts milling operations at shop floor.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.09.002
发表时间:
2013-12
影响因子:
14
作者:
Jixiang Yang;Y. Altintas
通讯作者:
Jixiang Yang;Y. Altintas
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
P. Marcotte;J. Dussault
通讯作者:
P. Marcotte;J. Dussault
DOI:
10.1115/1.4032393
发表时间:
2016-08
影响因子:
4
作者:
Mohsen Soori;B. Arezoo;Mohsen Habibi
通讯作者:
Mohsen Soori;B. Arezoo;Mohsen Habibi
影响因子:
5.6
作者:
Tao Huang;Xiaoming Zhang;H. Ding
通讯作者:
Tao Huang;Xiaoming Zhang;H. Ding
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
E. Shamoto;K. Akazawa
通讯作者:
E. Shamoto;K. Akazawa