Potential Threat Attracts Attention and Interferes With Voluntary Saccades

Potential Threat Attracts Attention and Interferes With Voluntary Saccades
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/emo0000041
复制
发表时间:
2015-06-01
期刊:
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Theeuwes, Jan
Theeuwes, Jan
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schmidt, Lisette J.;Belopolsky, Artem V.;Theeuwes, Jan

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

一些研究表明,视觉系统会优先考虑威胁性刺激。在本研究中,我们调查是否与电击的威胁相关的刺激引起注意,并因此干扰执行自愿眼球运动到其他位置。在2个实验中,我们发现,当一个恐惧条件和中性刺激同时呈现,自愿眼跳启动更快地向恐惧条件相比,中性刺激。此外,即使需要扫视到不同的位置,扫视也经常错误地去到威胁的位置。这意味着注意力自动转移到干扰眼跳执行的恐惧条件刺激。同样的结果模式也出现在中性刺激上,中性刺激总是与恐惧条件刺激一起出现,因此它本身就与威胁有关。目前的研究结果表明,威胁性刺激吸引视觉注意力,并随后偏见眼跳目标选择的反射方式。
Several studies have shown that threatening stimuli are prioritized by the visual system. In the present study we investigated whether a stimulus associated with a threat of electrical shock attracts attention and accordingly interferes with the execution of voluntary eye movements to other locations. In 2 experiments, we showed that when a fear-conditioned and a neutral stimulus were presented simultaneously, voluntary saccades were initiated faster toward fear-conditioned compared with neutral stimuli. Moreover, saccades often erroneously went to the location of threat even when a saccade to a different location was required. This implies an automatic shift of attention to a fear-conditioned stimulus that interferes with saccade execution. The same pattern of results was found for a neutral stimulus that was always presented together with the fear-conditioned stimulus and consequently itself became associated with threat. The current results indicate that threatening stimuli attract visual attention and subsequently bias saccade target selection in a reflexive fashion.