Slavery between Law, Morality, and Economy
Slavery between Law, Morality, and Economy
复制标题
法律、道德和经济之间的奴役
DOI：
10.1163/9789004262188_007
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Matthias Kaufmann
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Matthias Kaufmann
马蒂亚斯考夫曼介绍性评论莫利纳的工作德iustitia等法律（包括13个disputations）的第一篇论文是关于正义，法律和一般的权利，提供了一个最传统的调查的不同用途的iustitia（disp。1)和Ius（disp. 2），以及他们的部分，如神圣的法律，自然法，积极的法律，等等（disp。第3-7段）。此外，它涉及正义与非正义，正义的本质及其划分，以及“正义”的不同含义，明确提到了qq。58-63的iiaiae托马斯阿奎那的神学大全。第二篇论文致力于关于外部商品的交换正义（De iustitia commutative circa bona externa），包含760个争议，几乎占了整个巨著六卷中的三卷（即大约2,000页）。莫利纳从一开始就明确指出，在这种情况下，ius的最佳定义是“做某事、接受某事、保持某事或以任何方式行事的能力，因此，任何人在没有正当理由的情况下阻碍拥有某事的人，就是对他犯了法律的错误，是不公正的。从这个角度理解，ius是衡量不公正的准尺度。”[1]正是这个定义，显然指的是后来被贴上“主观权利”标签的东西，在莫利纳对奴隶制的处理中将是重要的。莫利纳然后继续1路易斯德莫利纳，德iustitia等iure，tr。二.分配11; editio novissima（Moguntiae：1659），col. 27.由于版本众多，其中有些不容易找到，我们决定在本卷中引用迪埃的话，沿着一个索引系统：使用（1）来自昆卡的前三卷的第一版和第四卷和第五卷的版本（安特卫普：1609年），由他在马德里学院的耶稣会兄弟安排，（2）本卷作者事实上使用的版本和（3）引用的论文、争论和数量，因为它们可以在1614年和1659年的美因茨版以及日内瓦版中找到。出于实用的原因，我们将首先提到论文，争议和数字，然后列和部分的网页签署的字母a，B...最后是威尼斯和/或科隆版的专栏。在本章中，我将使用editio novissima（Moguntiae：1659）指的是论文，争议和数量。其他版本中的相应位置可以通过本卷末尾的索引进行本地化。
Matthias Kaufmann introductory remarks the first treatise of Molina’s work De iustitia et iure (comprised of 13 disputations) is concerned with justice, law, and right in general—providing a mostly traditional survey of the different uses of iustitia (disp. 1) and ius (disp. 2), as well as their parts like divine law, natural law, positive law, and so on (disp. 3–7). Furthermore, it deals with justice and injustice, with the nature of justice and its divisions and different meanings of “just,” referring explicitly to qq. 58–63 of the iiaiiae of thomas aquinas’s Summa theologiae. the second treatise is dedicated to commutative justice concerning external goods (De iustitia commutative circa bona externa) and contains760 disputations filling nearly three of the six volumes (ie about 2,000 pages of folios) of the whole gigantic work. right from the beginning Molina makes it clear that in this context the best definition of ius is “a faculty to do something, to receive something, to maintain something or to act in any way, so that whomever hinders the one who has it without legitimate reasons, is doing him a legal wrong, an injustice. Understood in this way, ius is quasi a measure of injustice.” 1 and it is precisely this definition, which obviously refers to what is later labeled “subjective right,” that will be important in Molina’s treatment of slavery. Molina then goes on1 luis de Molina, De iustitia et iure, tr. ii disp. 1 1; editio novissima (Moguntiae: 1659), col. 27. because of the large number of editions, some of which are not easily accessible, we decided to give the quotations from diei in this volume with something along the lines of a concordance system: using (1) the first edition of the first three volumes from cuenca and the edition of volumes iv and v (antwerp: 1609) as arranged by his Jesuit brothers from the collegium of Madrid,(2) the editions de facto employed by the authors of this volume and (3) the quotation with treatise, disputation and number, as they are to be found in the Mainz editions from 1614 and 1659 as well as in the Geneva edition. For pragmatic reasons we will mention first treatise, disputation and number, then column and the part of the page signed with the letter a, b... finally the columns of the venice and/or cologne edition. in this chapter, i will use the editio novissima (Moguntiae: 1659) referring to treatise, disputation and number. the respective places in other editions may be localized via the concordance at the end of this volume.