Urine Volume and Change in Estimated GFR in a Community-Based Cohort Study
Urine Volume and Change in Estimated GFR in a Community-Based Cohort Study
复制标题
DOI:
10.2215/cjn.01990211
复制
发表时间:
2011-11-01
影响因子:
9.8
通讯作者:
Garg, Amit X.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Clark, William F.;Sontrop, Jessica M.;Garg, Amit X.
Background and objectives The effect of increased fluid intake on kidney function is unclear. This study evaluates the relationship between urine volume and renal decline over 6 years in a large community-based cohort.Design, setting, participants, & measurements This prospective cohort study was undertaken in Canada from 2002 to 2008. We obtained 24-hour urine samples from adult participants with an estimated GFR (eGFR) >= 60ml/min per 1.73 m(2) at study entry. Percentage annual change in eGFR from baseline was categorized as average decline = 5% (rapid decline).Results 2148 participants provided valid 24-hour urine samples, grouped as = 3 L/d (7.7%). Baseline eGFR for each category of urine volume was 90, 88, 84, and 87 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. Overall, eGFR declined by 1% per year, with 10% demonstrating rapid decline and 40% demonstrating mild-to-moderate decline. An inverse, graded relationship was evident between urine volume and eGFR decline: For each increasing category of 24-hour urine volume, percentage annual eGFR decline was progressively slower, from 1.3%, 1.0%, 0.8%, to 0.5%, respectively; P = 0.02. Compared with those with urine volume 1 to 1.9 Lid, those with urine volume >= 3 L/d were significantly less likely to demonstrate mild-to-moderate decline (adjusted odds ratio 0.66; 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.94) or rapid decline (adjusted odds ratio 0.46; 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.92); adjusted for age, gender, baseline eGFR, medication use for hypertension (including diuretics), proteinuria, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.Conclusions In this community-based cohort, decline in kidney function was significantly slower in those with higher versus lower urine volume. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6: 2634-2641, 2011. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01990211