Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study
Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033516
复制
发表时间：
2020-04-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Hoddinott，Pat
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Duncan，Edward;O'Cathain，Alicia;Hoddinott，Pat
ObjectiveTo improve the quality and consistency of intervention development reporting in health research.DesignThis was a consensus exercise comprising of two simultaneous and identical three-round e-Delphi studies（one with experts in intervention development and one with wider stakeholders including funders，journal editors and public inventive members），followed by a consensus workshop.德尔菲项目系统地从两个先前的系统评价和定性访谈study. PropantsIntervention开发人员（n=26）和更广泛的利益相关者（n=18）从英国，北美和欧洲参加了单独的电子德尔菲研究。干预开发人员（n=13）和更广泛的利益相关者（n=13）参加了为期1天的共识workshop.Resultse-Delphi参与者达成共识的15个报告项目。根据协商一致会议的反馈意见，商定了14个项目的最终列入和措辞，并对每个项目进行了说明和解释。项目重点关注背景、目的、目标人群、方法、证据、理论、指导原则、利益相关者的贡献、开发过程中内容或格式的变化、子组所需的变化、持续的不确定性和开放获取出版物。他们形成了指导（指导报告的干预发展）清单，其中包含了每个项目的描述和解释，以及良好的reporting. Conclusionsconclusions为基础的报告指南干预发展在卫生研究现在可供出版商和研究人员使用的例子。GUIDED有可能导致更大的透明度，提高质量，改善对干预发展研究和实践的学习。
ObjectiveTo improve the quality and consistency of intervention development reporting in health research.DesignThis was a consensus exercise consisting of two simultaneous and identical three-round e-Delphi studies (one with experts in intervention development and one with wider stakeholders including funders, journal editors and public involvement members), followed by a consensus workshop. Delphi items were systematically derived from two preceding systematic reviews and a qualitative interview study.ParticipantsIntervention developers (n=26) and wider stakeholders (n=18) from the UK, North America and Europe participated in separate e-Delphi studies. Intervention developers (n=13) and wider stakeholders (n=13) participated in a 1-day consensus workshop.Resultse-Delphi participants achieved consensus on 15 reporting items. Following feedback from the consensus meeting, the final inclusion and wording of 14 items with description and explanations for each item were agreed. Items focus on context, purpose, target population, approaches, evidence, theory, guiding principles, stakeholder contribution, changes in content or format during the development process, required changes for subgroups, continuing uncertainties, and open access publication. They form the GUIDED (GUIDance for the rEporting of intervention Development) checklist, which contains a description and explanation of each item, alongside examples of good reporting.ConclusionsConsensus-based reporting guidance for intervention development in health research is now available for publishers and researchers to use. GUIDED has the potential to lead to greater transparency, and enhance quality and improve learning about intervention development research and practice.