Deliberative democracy: A sympathetic comment
Deliberative democracy: A sympathetic comment
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00371.x
复制
发表时间：
2000-09-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Freeman, S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Freeman, S
与哲学中的许多新思想一样，对协商民主的描述如此之多，以至于许多人怀疑这一想法是否有什么意义。但协商民主已经不仅仅是哲学家们贴在不同思想上的另一个流行标签(尽管这种情况确实发生了)。讨论也已经超越了这样一种程度，即团结支持这一观点的哲学家不仅仅是拒绝某些根深蒂固的观点。在这个阶段，协商民主的支持者之间存在着几个相当明确的一致(和分歧)领域。这篇文章的目的是讨论这些，并讨论支持协商民主的更有特色的论点。这不是对文献的全面审查，甚至也不是对所讨论的卷的内容的批判性审查。相反，如果我能澄清一些区分协商民主与其他概念的主要思想和论点，我的目的就会实现。
As with many novel ideas in philosophy, accounts of deliberative democracy have so proliferated that many wonder whether there is anything to the idea. But deliberative democracy has become more than just another popular label that philosophers attach to different ideas (although this happens). Discussion also has gone beyond the point where what unites philosophers who affirm the idea is more than just their rejection of some entrenched view. At this stage there are several fairly well-defined areas of agreement (and disagreement) among the proponents of deliberative democracy. The aim of this essay is to discuss these, and to discuss the more distinctive arguments offered in support of a deliberative democracy. This is not a comprehensive review of the literature nor even a critical review of the contents of the volumes under discussion. Rather, my purpose will be achieved if I can clarify some of the main ideas and arguments that distinguish deliberative democracy from other conceptions.